Radical with negative radicand squared

  • Thread starter Thread starter OceanSpring
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Negative Radical
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion surrounding the square root of a squared negative number and the implications of using real versus complex numbers. It clarifies that while sqrt(x^2) equals |x|, the square root of a negative number is undefined in real numbers, necessitating the use of complex numbers where sqrt(-1) equals i or -i. Participants emphasize that sqrt(x) is only valid for nonnegative x in real number contexts, and that squaring the square root of a negative number leads to negative results due to the involvement of imaginary numbers. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these distinctions to avoid misconceptions in mathematical expressions. Overall, the topic underscores the necessity of recognizing the conditions under which these mathematical identities hold true.
OceanSpring
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Can someone explain this for me.

sqrt x^2 = x

(sqrt x)^2 = x

Yet sqrt -1^2 = |x| = -(-1) = 1

(sqrt -1)^2 = (sqrt -1)(sqrt -1) = -1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This topic gets discussed many times here in the past. The confusion centers on the sqrt(x^2) producing a positive root x and a negative root -x. The square root of a negative number is not defined if we deal strictly with Real numbers instead we must extend the definition to complex numbers where i^2 = -1. In that case, sqrt(-1) is either i or -i.

This may help:

http://mathbitsnotebook.com/Algebra1/Radicals/RADNegativeUnder.html
 
I know about imaginary numbers but I don't think they apply here. Most texts I've looked at say the square root of a radicand squared is equal to the square of the radical. Yet, when you take the square root of negative number squared you get the positive root and when you square the square root of a negative number you get the negative number. I hope this makes sense, if I could write this out in symbolic form I'm sure it would be clearer.

jedishrfu said:
This topic gets discussed many times here in the past. The confusion centers on the sqrt(x^2) producing a positive root x and a negative root -x. The square root of a negative number is not defined if we deal strictly with Real numbers instead we must extend the definition to complex numbers where i^2 = -1. In that case, sqrt(-1) is either i or -i.

This may help:

http://mathbitsnotebook.com/Algebra1/Radicals/RADNegativeUnder.html
 
Given radicand x then you're saying: (sqrt(x))^2 = x

so if x=4 then the statement would be either (sqrt(4))^2 = (2)^2 = 4 or (sqrt(4))^2 = (-2)^2 = 4 right?

and if x = -4 then we get either:

(sqrt(-4))^2 = (2i)^2 = -4 or (sqrt(-4))^2 = (-2i)^2 = -4

so yes what you have said is true when complex numbers are used but when only real numbers are allows then
the expression sqrt(x) where x<0 is undefined and so the stmt (sqrt(x))^2 = x is not valid.
 
jedishrfu said:
This topic gets discussed many times here in the past. The confusion centers on the sqrt(x^2) producing a positive root x and a negative root -x.
By convention, the square root of a positive number is positive, so ##\sqrt{x^2} = x## only when x ≥ 0. Most books show this identity: ##\sqrt{x^2} = |x|## to cover the case when x < 0.
jedishrfu said:
The square root of a negative number is not defined if we deal strictly with Real numbers instead we must extend the definition to complex numbers where i^2 = -1. In that case, sqrt(-1) is either i or -i.

This may help:

http://mathbitsnotebook.com/Algebra1/Radicals/RADNegativeUnder.html

OceanSpring said:
I know about imaginary numbers but I don't think they apply here. Most texts I've looked at say the square root of a radicand squared is equal to the square of the radical.
If they do, I believe you are missing some "fine print" -- namely the condition that x is nonnegative.
OceanSpring said:
Yet, when you take the square root of negative number squared you get the positive root
Yes.
OceanSpring said:
and when you square the square root of a negative number you get the negative number.
Yes, but in the intermediate step (the square root of a negative number) you have an imaginary number.
OceanSpring said:
I hope this makes sense, if I could write this out in symbolic form I'm sure it would be clearer.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top