Radioactive Dating: Calculating Half-Life & Remaining Mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of remaining mass in radioactive dating, specifically for lead-210 (Pb-210) and mercury-206 (Hg-206). The initial mass of Pb-210 is 7.5g, with a half-life of 22.3 years, and after 17.5 years, the calculated remaining mass is 4.36g. Participants clarify that the remaining mass of Pb-210 should lead to a conversion to Hg-206, suggesting that the remaining mass of Hg-206 should be 3.14g, but discrepancies arise in calculations. The conversation highlights confusion over the decay process and the impact of mass change during alpha decay, with some expressing frustration over multiple-choice questions that may mislead students. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the principles behind radioactive decay and the nuances of mass changes in these calculations.
toothpaste666
Messages
516
Reaction score
20

Homework Statement



chemproblem.png

Homework Equations


N= (N_0) e^(-kT)
k = ln(2)/(T_1/2)

The Attempt at a Solution


N0 = 7.5g
T_1/2 = 22.3 years
T = 17.5 years

k = ln(2)/22.3 = .031

N = 7.5 e^(-.031 * 17.5)
N = 4.36 g

So I chose A, but the correct answer was B. can't figure out where I went wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You calculated the amount of Pb210 after 17.5a, you were asked for the amount of Hg206
 
then wouldn't it be 7.5 - 4.36 = 3.14? because you start with 7.5 and end up with 4.36 and the rest was converted to Hg206. I am still doing something wrong though because I am supposed to end up with 3.09
 
Do you think that after 22.5years, 7.5g of Pb will become 3.75g of Pb and 3.75g of Hg?
Does Hg have the same density as Pb?
 
Pb is slightly more dense. I'm not sure how to include this in the calculation though. if at the beginning all 7.5 grams is Pb and after the time has elapsed 4.36 of the 7.5 is Pb then I have a hard time understanding how Hg won't be the remainder of the 7.5 grams
 
What is the decay mode?
 
i am pretty sure it undergoes alpha decay
 
I would look for atomic numbers of isotopes mentioned.

But in general, if it is alpha decay, you can assume mass of the nucleus changes by 4.
 
  • Like
Likes toothpaste666
Bit of a trick question IMHO. Firstly you misread it, but I'd call that a set trap.:devil: Then you made your calculation and, once you realize the first trap the result is clearly nearer one figure, D, than another one. But the second trap :devil: is there is a 2% difference due to the mass change (which was given in the problem).

It would be fair to ask questions as a quiz when it is possible to get answers by principles or ballpark reasoning. It would be fair to ask the question with no answers given, since you can eliminate some answers by ballpark, but you cannot choose between B and D without calculation. But they have set you up by two answers meant to confirm you in mistakes!

These people are evil. :devil: :devil:
 
  • Like
Likes toothpaste666
  • #10
yeah i like better when tests are not multiple choice and have partial credit. That way they can grade you on your method of solving instead of just running it through a scantron =\

so the reason its B) is because of the mass that becomes the alpha particle?
 
Back
Top