Finding the Radius of Gyration of a Racquet?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the radius of gyration for a racquet modeled as a uniform lamina within the right-hand loop of the equation r² = cos(2θ). The correct formula for the radius of gyration is established as radius of g = sqrt(Inertia around y-axis / mass). The mass is determined using the integral m = ∫(0 to π/4) ∫(0 to sqrt(cos(2θ))) r cos(θ) r dr dθ. The conversation emphasizes the importance of the moment of inertia and the center of mass in determining the sweet spot of the racquet, particularly when rotating around the line x = -1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polar coordinates and integration techniques
  • Familiarity with the concept of moment of inertia
  • Knowledge of the radius of gyration formula
  • Basic principles of rotational dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the moment of inertia for various shapes
  • Learn about the parallel axis theorem in rotational dynamics
  • Explore the application of polar coordinates in area integrals
  • Investigate the relationship between center of mass and sweet spot in sports equipment
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mechanical engineering, and sports science who are interested in the dynamics of rotating bodies and the design of sports equipment.

justagirl
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Radius of Gyration? REALLY need help ASAP!

Hey -

If any of you can help me with the following problem asap that would be awesome!

A racquet consists of uniform lamina that occupies the region inside the right-hand loop of r^2 = cos 2theta on the end of a handle (assumed to be of neglible mass) corresponding to the interval -1<=x<=0. Find the radius of gyration of the racquet around the line x = -1. Where is its sweet spot?

I know the radius of gyration around the y-axis can be found by the using the formula: radius of g = sqrt(Inertia around y-axis / mass)

Is this the correct formula for mass?

m = int(0...pi/4)int (0...sqrt(cos2theta) r cos theta r dr dtheta?

If so, how would revolving it around the line x = -1 instead of x = 0 change it?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rotating about x=0 would give you give different moment than rotating around x=-1 and different moment of inertia.

I think the limits of integration for theta are -\frac{\pi}{2} and \frac{\pi}{2}.

IIRC, you want to find the center of mass of the racquet. The sweet spot is at the center of mass where the maximum transfer of momentum would occur.
 
Last edited:
justagirl said:
...

I know the radius of gyration around the y-axis can be found by the using the formula: radius of g = sqrt(Inertia around y-axis / mass)

Also consider doing this using the formulas for an area rather than a mass:
R=\sqrt{\frac{I_{x}}{A}}
where I_{x} is the moment of inertia of the area relative to the x axis.
 
Last edited:
Correction - the limits of \theta are -\frac{\pi}{4} and \frac{\pi}{4}. Been awhile since I have done this stuff - I should have graphed it first.

The first step is to find the mass moment of inertia I_c with respect to the area's center of mass (remembering that the handle is massless).

Then the moment of inertia through a parallel axis is just I = I_c + md^2, where m is the mass of the area in question, and d is the distance between the centroid (center of mass of the area) and axis about which the object would rotate.

So the handle goes from -1 to 0, and the lamina goes between 0 to 1. Let the distance from x=0 to the lamina centroid by d_c, then d\,=\,1\,+\,d_c

Then once you know I,

radius of gyration g = \sqrt{\frac{I}{m}}.

If the axis of rotation was the y-axis (x=0), then d\,=\,d_c, and the radius of gyration would be less.

Remember, the greater the moment arm the more resistance to rotation, i.e. it would take more torque to get the same angular velocity.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K