Raising and Lowering Operators

  • Thread starter Thread starter dFrankCalc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
dFrankCalc
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am working on a homework problem from quantum mechanics. In order to solve the problem I need to derive the raising and lowering operators.

In order to to this I did the following:

S+operator = <1,i | S+operator | 1,j > where i = 1, 0, -1 with i = 1 corresponding to row one etc. I let j = 1, 0, -1 , corresponding to the columns where j = 1 is column one.

I was able to calculate every thing the same as what the book has i.e.
S+operator =hbar*sqrt(2)*[0,1,0;0,0,1; 0,0,0] except I am off by a factor of sqrt(2). Where does this factor come from?



DFrankCalc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Normalization probably. Are the eigenstates of your operator normalized if needed?
 
The Sz eigen states that I used to get S+ are properly normalized.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top