Random Photos

In summary: I only remember the Canadian part.I took this photo of some Canadian wolves a few weeks ago.In summary, the photo is of Canadian wolves.
  • #1,681
Rive said:
Stripes
Very cool!
Particularly that the shadows are at different angles, that really caught my attention! :smile:

Rive said:
Distances...
A lovely view! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Rive
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #1,682
Toadstools, Big Water Utah

Toadstools_Jan2024-44-1.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes pinball1970, Rive, DennisN and 2 others
  • #1,683
Power line tower from my facebook today:

power-line-tower.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Love
Likes pinball1970, DennisN, collinsmark and 8 others
  • #1,684
Chinese new year decorations at the market
IMG20240129093544.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN, berkeman and Rive
  • #1,685
Before and after a corrector plate cleaning on my 10" scope:

Meade_Plate_Cleaning_1.jpg

Meade_Plate_Cleaning_2.jpg


When it comes to cleaning the corrector plate on a telescope (such as a Schmidt-Cassegrain, Maksutov-Cassegrain, or Rowe-Ackerman Schmidt Astrograph), the primary lens of a refractor, or the primary mirror if the telescope doesn't have a corrector plate (e.g., Newtonian, Ritchey–Chrétien, or [Modified] Dall-Kircham), the best advice regarding when it is time to clean is:

Procrastinate
Procrastinate
Procrastinate

It's the one thing in life where procrastination is usually a good thing.

A little dust on the objective doesn't help the contrast, but other than that doesn't negatively impact the image as much as you might think. The reason for the procrastination is to lessen the chance of scratching the sensitive anti-reflective (AR) coatings on the lens or mirror. Less frequent cleanings mean less chance of scratches.

And when you do clean, do it carefully. As in really, really carefully.

The before picture above represents about a year and a half to two years of successful procrastination.

(I plan to finish up a couple of targets with this scope and then take it down for some planned maintenance soon anyway, so I figured now would be a good time to clean the corrector plate.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Love
Likes pinball1970, DennisN, morrobay and 2 others
  • #1,686
I know @phinds will appreciate this from my Facebook feed today... :smile:

1706653934960.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes pinball1970, DennisN, Rive and 7 others
  • #1,687
I had to think for a minute to figure out how you even DO that, and then I realized that it's not conceptually difficult, just VERY tedious and you have to love working with hand tools, which I am not good at (at least, not to this level).
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, Rive, BillTre and 2 others
  • #1,688
IMG_20240205_073637.jpg
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, DennisN, Rive and 3 others
  • #1,690
IMG_20240205_074707.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes pinball1970, DennisN, Rive and 1 other person
  • #1,691
IMG_20240205_074902.jpg
IMG_20240205_075057.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, DennisN, Rive and 1 other person
  • #1,692
Remote , only camping. Had read that there are very strong tidal currents between the islands. So used a safety line. However did not experience any during several days visit. You would be long gone out there.
IMG_20240205_080741.jpg
IMG_20240205_080751.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes pinball1970, Haborix, DennisN and 2 others
  • #1,693
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #1,694
Thought I had lost this.

IMG_20240209_143647_975.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Hamiltonian, jtbell, collinsmark and 6 others
  • #1,695
It looks like something that I would have to hide so that my wife wouldn't try to throw it away. :oldtongue:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Tom.G, DennisN, BillTre and 2 others
  • #1,696
Borg said:
It looks like something that I would have to hide so that my wife wouldn't try to throw it away. :oldtongue:
It was a gift off my Ex, she did not like me talking about physics but she liked buying ties!
 
  • Like
Likes Borg
  • #1,697
pinball1970 said:
It was a gift off my Ex, she did not like me talking about physics but she liked buying ties nooses!
She was laying the groundwork to handle the problem if you didn't tone it down...
 
  • Haha
Likes Borg, phinds and pinball1970
  • #1,698
Around Jomtien. Fresh strawberries
IMG_20240209_194308.jpg
IMG_20240209_131800.jpg
IMG_20240210_073817.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN, Rive, pinball1970 and 1 other person
  • #1,700
The plaque.

IMG_20240210_125617_180.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, DennisN, Rive and 2 others
  • #1,701
Chinese New Year decorations outside central Library.

IMG_20240210_133505_792.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes morrobay, collinsmark, DennisN and 3 others
  • #1,702
Also visited here

IMG_20240210_122852_157.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN, Rive and Astranut
  • #1,703
IMG_20240210_122829_125.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, DennisN, Rive and 3 others
  • #1,704
Stunning inside.

IMG_20240210_123248_448~2.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes jtbell, collinsmark, DennisN and 4 others
  • #1,706
A little help from @Astranut with editing!
A few things named after this guy in Manchester, John Dalton.

IMG_20240210_124110_948~2.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, DennisN, Rive and 1 other person
  • #1,707
This is where I thought P52 would be, lower lighting. EDIT, but not facing that window!


IMG_20240210_123917_757~3.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, fresh_42, DennisN and 3 others
  • #1,708
I took this for the books, the ones on the bottom opposite the chair are the height of the case they are in, about three feet.

IMG_20240210_124143_807~3.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN, Rive, morrobay and 1 other person
  • #1,709
pinball1970 said:
I never knew the connection between Manchester and Abraham Lincoln.

https://acws.co.uk/archives-misc-lincoln_letter

View attachment 340133
With that slight blur that statue sent me into a cognitive dissonance loop ...
... but after some googlework I found that there are plenty of other people out there who finds Lincoln and Sherlock Cumberbatch ( :wink: ) similar enough o0)
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970
  • #1,710
pinball1970 said:
This is where I thought P52 would be, lower lighting. EDIT, but not facing that window!
Nice shot! :smile:
 
  • #1,711
"What do you mean it's your bed? We're resting here now."

Katter - m2.jpg


(my two cats shot with smartphone a while ago)

@Rive, by the way, this was shot a while ago and in the evening, and here I directed an adjustable table lamp towards the cats before I took the shot. If I hadn't done that the photo would have become pretty dull and "greyish" since the ambient light in the room was pretty low in intensity.
 
  • Like
Likes jtbell, Bystander, pinball1970 and 5 others
  • #1,712
DennisN said:
@Rive, by the way, this was shot a while ago and in the evening, and here I directed an adjustable table lamp towards the cats before I took the shot. If I hadn't done that the photo would have become pretty dull and "greyish" since the ambient light in the room was pretty low in intensity.

For comparison, here's another recent shot of one of the cats without using any supporting light (just ambient light)... and the photo becomes more washed out.

It also becomes more difficult to get a sharp shot in low light (due to the camera probably compensating for low light by increasing exposure time, and during longer exposure times tiny movements of my hand holding the smartphone become more apparent).

Katter - m3.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Rive, collinsmark, Bystander and 2 others
  • #1,713
DennisN said:
I directed an adjustable table lamp towards the cats before I took the shot.
I've tried that too, but does not work for black cats:sorry:
It's the same what happens with flash. Everything is already overexposed, while the cat in the middle is still like a black hole... 😭

I think it's about the difference in the dynamic ranges involved. To have the (black) cat proper on the photo, I need sufficient dynamic ranges both on the lower end (cat) and in the middle (background) of the brightness scale in the same time.

Most likely I'll try to explore the dark arts of postprocessing (as was suggested by @jtbell ), against my beliefs and inherent laziness :doh:
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN
  • #1,714
DennisN said:
I directed an adjustable table lamp towards the cats before I took the shot.
How would they have reacted if you had used the flashlamp? :biggrin:
 
  • Haha
Likes DennisN
  • #1,715
Rive said:
Most likely I'll try to explore the dark arts of postprocessing (as was suggested by @jtbell ), against my beliefs and inherent laziness :doh:
I don't have anything against post. In my wet darkroom days I would dodge and burn, use different contrast filters for different parts of the image, bleach with ferri, and on and on.

Another point: the unprocessed image coming straight out of your digital camera is the result of its software's decisions about how the image should look. In post, you can use your decisions.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes symbolipoint, BillTre, Rive and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
698
  • General Discussion
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top