Random Thoughts 7

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This thread features a collection of random thoughts and reflections from participants, touching on various topics including nostalgia for a community member, humorous musings about language and technology, reactions to cultural events, and personal anecdotes. The scope includes informal commentary, light-hearted debates, and references to popular media.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express nostalgia for a community member named Evo, with inquiries about her well-being.
  • Humorous reflections on the limitations of AI, particularly regarding the classic tongue twister about woodchucks.
  • Discussion around the cultural impact of the sitcom "Friends," with varying opinions on its characters and humor.
  • References to the founding of Turkey and its implications for secularism, with some light-hearted commentary on food choices.
  • Comments on Neil DeGrasse Tyson's approach to teaching critical thinking, with mixed reactions to his style and audience engagement.
  • Observations about customer service experiences, highlighting a common frustration among participants.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share a light-hearted tone but express differing opinions on various topics, including the humor of "Friends," the effectiveness of Neil DeGrasse Tyson's videos, and cultural sensitivities regarding secularism. No consensus is reached on these matters.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions reference specific cultural events or media, which may carry different meanings or implications for different participants. The humor and sentiments expressed are subjective and may not resonate universally.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in informal discussions about popular culture, community dynamics, and light-hearted debates may find this thread engaging.

  • #871
A bunch of people in my office are getting moved to another building. I'm staying but someone decided that I have to move into the next seat over - probably because they didn't want to adjust their planned seating chart. :rolleyes:
 
  • Wow
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: BillTre and pinball1970
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #872
55 years this week Apollo 11 landed on the moon. With all the Space x crazy stuff plus the first Ariane 6 launch I wanted to compare footage.
Even today the 1969 footage is really amazing. The fact it is slow motion just adds to the coolness.
See the amount of debris? Wow.

Anyway, not worth a thread but certainly worth a mention.

Apollo 11



Space x last month.



Ariane 6 last week

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark, WWGD and phinds
  • #873
I thought I had inadvertently walked into the NFL until I realized I was standing right in front of the men's room , with people desperate for a urinal.
 
  • #875
Pretty bizarre, due to careless misreading. Free trial! Somehow, for a second, I thought it was a legal trial. Are they suing me for free? Then coffee kicked in.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: jack action
  • #876
Every year, scores of boaters travel the 6,000-mile route around the Eastern United States.
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/loopers-great-loop-experience
The Great Loop has been called the last great adventure in North America, a 6,000-mile journey from the Mississippi River to the Gulf Intracoastal Waterways, around Florida and then up the Atlantic coast, across the Erie Canal, and through the Great Lakes. In 2022, only 227 boats returned to their point of origin, “crossing their wake” and earning the privilege of flying the gold Great Loop burgee (flag). Most “Loopers,” traveling in boats at least 30 feet long, took about a year to complete the route. Omaha Nebraska’s Mike Straub completed the loop in just 91 days. He did the whole thing on a Sea-Doo jet ski.

I think retracing the Lewis and Clark expedition would be a great adventure.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Borg
  • #877
Anyone know how to interpret a 'perimeter acre'?

Perimeter Acres133,489.06

from: https://www.kptv.com/wildfires/

perimeterperimeter acres
1.14179.5
3.86226.09
4.4701
50.8218432.12
147.4384364.39

Plugging in the numbers from the above fires, I get an R² of 1.000 for a quadratic function: y = 2.1122x² +264.07x -474.36

where y is 'perimeter acres' and x is the perimeter, in miles.
 
  • #878
OmCheeto said:
Anyone know how to interpret a 'perimeter acre'?

Perimeter Acres133,489.06

from: https://www.kptv.com/wildfires/

perimeterperimeter acres
1.14179.5
3.86226.09
4.4701
50.8218432.12
147.4384364.39

Plugging in the numbers from the above fires, I get an R² of 1.000 for a quadratic function: y = 2.1122x² +264.07x -474.36

where y is 'perimeter acres' and x is the perimeter, in miles.
A perimeter acre is probably defined as
$$\frac{\text{length of the wildfire's perimeter}}{\text{area of wildfire}}.$$
 
  • #879
I'm guessing that "perimeter acres" means the area (near the perimeter) that is actually on fire, assuming the area in the middle is burnt out.

Then the average width of the burning area is approximately the "perimeter area" divided by the "perimeter length" (assuming the width is a lot smaller than the length).

NamePerimeter length
##p## miles
Perimeter area
##a## acres
Estimated perimeter width
##a/(640p)## miles
Converted
to yards
##\times 1760##
Lemolo
2.14​
179.5​
0.13106​
231​
Ore
3.86​
226.09​
0.09152​
161​
Trail
4.4​
701.38​
0.24907​
438​
Larch Creek
50.82​
18432.1​
0.56671​
997​
Lone Rock
147.43​
84364.4​
0.89411​
1574​

The values seem plausible.

(For readers outside the UK and US, a yard is about one metre.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
  • #880
Crowdstrike, anyone? Ive yet to look at my computer. ( Assuming people who have more than one OS installed).
 
Last edited:
  • #881
OmCheeto said:
Anyone know how to interpret a 'perimeter acre'?

Perimeter Acres133,489.06

from: https://www.kptv.com/wildfires/

perimeterperimeter acres
1.14179.5
3.86226.09
4.4701
50.8218432.12
147.4384364.39

Plugging in the numbers from the above fires, I get an R² of 1.000 for a quadratic function: y = 2.1122x² +264.07x -474.36

where y is 'perimeter acres' and x is the perimeter, in miles.
Seems not to be defined at x=1, where you get a negative value.
 
  • #882
DrGreg said:
(For readers outside the UK and US, a yard is about one metre.)
And I thought it as a little place behind the house. :cool:
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
  • #883
fresh_42 said:
And I thought it as a little place behind the house. :cool:
With two dogs in it.
 
  • #884
WWGD said:
With two dogs in it.
Must be Chihuahuas if it is limited to 91 cm.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
  • #885
docnet said:
A perimeter acre is probably defined as
$$\frac{\text{length of the wildfire's perimeter}}{\text{area of wildfire}}.$$
So it's 1/length? Length is like wavelength, and 1/wavelength is frequency, so....
What's the frequency, Docnet?

DrGreg said:
I'm guessing that "perimeter acres" means the area (near the perimeter) that is actually on fire, assuming the area in the middle is burnt out.

Then the average width of the burning area is approximately the "perimeter area" divided by the "perimeter length" (assuming the width is a lot smaller than the length).

NamePerimeter length
p miles
Perimeter area
a acres
Estimated perimeter width
a/(640p) miles
Converted
to yards
×1760
Lemolo
2.14​
179.5​
0.13106​
231​
Ore
3.86​
226.09​
0.09152​
161​
Trail
4.4​
701.38​
0.24907​
438​
Larch Creek
50.82​
18432.1​
0.56671​
997​
Lone Rock
147.43​
84364.4​
0.89411​
1574​

The values seem plausible.

(For readers outside the UK and US, a yard is about one metre.)
I agree, that this seems like a plausible answer.
But I suspect it is wrong.
I loosened up my Google search parameters and discovered this PDF of a 1976 document, where I found on page 64:

Figure 7.--Approximate​
area of wind-driven​
fires, using Anderson's​
double-ellipse formulae​
in appendix II. In​
this figure, the area within the approximate​
perimeter (acres) has​
been divided by the​
squared distance (in​
chains) from the point​
of origin to the head​
of the fire. Thus,​
this ratio decreases with windspeed while​
the area itself actually increases.​

where they use 'chain' as a unit of measure, and Anderson's double-ellipse formulae in appendix II looks to be a rabbit hole of maths.


WWGD said:
Seems not to be defined at x=1, where you get a negative value.
At least it didn't include the square root of negative 1.

In any event, never mind.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
  • #886
OmCheeto said:
So it's 1/length? Length is like wavelength, and 1/wavelength is frequency, so....
What's the frequency, Docnet?
The quantity perimeter/(surface area) is just a concrete measure of... perimeter per surface area (sorry for the redundancy, but it was so self-explanatory that I'm just so puzzled with your question.

If it helps, the quantity could be loosely interpreted as the "oscillation count" of the perimeter to measure how "wavy" or "curvy" the perimeter is. But there is probably no benefit in defining it using frequencies and wavelengths. The quantity would have a minimum value (corresponding to a circle) and no maximum value (corresponding to certain fractals).

In any case, it may not be the right interpretation of the data, continuing this tangent may not be helpful. I was just trying to offer an alternative.
 
  • #887
jack action said:
  • At 18, they ask for 5-year experience;
  • At 50, you are too old to work;
  • At 62, you are too young to retire.

So true, to complete the story:

- I notified management on April Fool's that I plan to retire on May 1st
- I retired on May 1st and
- I got to exclaim May Day! May Day!

As so many retirees don't know what to do in the days following retirement.

Retirement is NEVER what you expect it to be.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
  • #888
jedishrfu said:
As so many retirees don't know what to do in the days following retirement.
I may try being a rock star full time.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: BillTre and fresh_42
  • #889
pinball1970 said:
I may try being a rock star full time.
Honestly?

I wish you all the best and seriously hope you will!
I mean, if Taylor can.
 
  • #890
WWGD said:
Crowdstrike, anyone? Ive yet to look at my computer. ( Assuming people who have more than one OS installed).
Crowdstrike provides security add-on to Windows for businesses, not personal computers. Are you a business? Do you pay them to provide their service to you?
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc and BillTre
  • #891
fresh_42 said:
Honestly?
A little tongue in cheek yes, BUT there would be no more restrictions on practice and gigs.
If we have a gig in London or Scotland we have to set off 12ish so I have to book days off.
Certainly make things easier that way.

EDIT: The bassist is 68 and seems relaxed with his retirement and still doing music. Hopefully I can find similar.
 
Last edited:
  • #892
Retirement has kept me surprisingly busy.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Astranut, collinsmark, Borg and 2 others
  • #893
fresh_42 said:
Honestly?

I wish you all the best and seriously hope you will!
I mean, if Taylor can.
Yes, he can jerk about global warming while touring the globe solo in his mega jet. Taylor did it.
Leason. Be more like Roger Taylor, not the other one.
 
  • #894
phinds said:
Crowdstrike provides security add-on to Windows for businesses, not personal computers. Are you a business? Do you pay them to provide their service to you?
Hence the "anyone?".
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: phinds
  • #895
WWGD said:
Yes, he can jerk about global warming while touring the globe solo in his mega jet. Taylor did it.
Leason. Be more like Roger Taylor, not the other one.
We all manage to fit in one van for gigs so the planet is safe from me!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astranut, BillTre, WWGD and 1 other person
  • #896
WWGD said:
Yes, he can jerk about global warming while touring the globe solo in his mega jet. Taylor did it.
Leason. Be more like Roger Taylor, not the other one.
What do you have against Swift? Ok, it's a bit clumsy, however, it's simple.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #897
pinball1970 said:
We all manage to fit in one van for gigs so the planet is safe from me!
I haven't had a car in a while. My gas is the only contributor. I see people avoid me, but only within a 100ft radius.
Edit: Just please leave the van. Down by the river!
 
  • #898
Musk moving X and Space X from California to Texas.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astranut and pinball1970
  • #900
WWGD said:
I haven't had a car in a while. My gas is the only contributor. I see people avoid me, but only within a 100ft radius.
Edit: Just please leave the van. Down by the river!
It is a horrible, ugly, uncomfortable, old thing but we love it. Even when It broke down in Macclesfield when we had a gig in Derby! It is a re-done UK Royal mail van. We only take two vehicles if we are also supplying the PA as well.
I took this from vehicle 2 on way to Lakes.

IMG_20230923_153637_224.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto, Astranut, WWGD and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11K
Views
583K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K