Random Thoughts Part 4 - Split Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random Thoughts
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a variety of topics, beginning with the reopening of a thread on the Physics Forums. Participants express relief at the continuation of the conversation and share light-hearted banter about past threads. There are inquiries about quoting from previous threads and discussions about job opportunities for friends. The conversation shifts to humorous takes on mathematics, particularly the concept of "Killing vector fields," which one participant humorously critiques as dangerous. Participants also share personal anecdotes, including experiences with power outages and thoughts on teaching at university. The tone remains casual and playful, with discussions about the challenges of winter, the joys of friendship, and even a few jokes about life experiences. The thread captures a blend of humor, personal stories, and light philosophical musings, all while maintaining a sense of community among the forum members.
  • #1,681
I'm afraid to look old. I don't know why, but after looking at my pictures taken 15 years ago then looking at myself in the mirror, I'm sad and so worried.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #1,682
WWGD said:
I got into a kind of awkward conversation with an English teacher/professor (not clear whom).
Should be, "(not clear which)".
I know 2-3 things about literature ( not proud of it, but it's true), and I corrected him on the line " It was the best of times, it was the worst of times" being from a Tale of Two Cities. It is one of the few things I know, probably from watching Jeopardy. He seemed embarrassed and kept apologizing and trying to explain why he had gotten it wrong. Any other line, I would most likely not have been able to source, but somehow this line came up in the conversation.
What book did he think it was from?
 
  • #1,683
zoobyshoe said:
Should be, "(not clear which)".

What book did he think it was from?

Yes, my bad, "not clear which", obviously, I don't know what (or maybe even if) I was thinking. I think he believed it was from Oliver Twist. It is strange when you know facts detached from a context, as is the case with much of the stuff I have learned from watching Jeopardy. I think this guy was worried that I would consider his ignorance of this fact to be representative of a more general level of ignorance on the topic. In a sense, the conversation is a random sample of his knowledge, but not necessarily a representative one.
 
Last edited:
  • #1,684
I am currently having a job in school library and the courses I am taking are elective. I would want to land a full time job in some company :oops:. Even they allow me to work only 1 or 2 months as probationary periods, I can still have some money. I've sent my applications to several but still get no reply.:frown: People don't seem to like an old talented student - super star.
 
  • #1,685
Silicon Waffle said:
I am currently having a job in school library and the courses I am taking are elective. I would want to land a full time job in some company :oops:. Even they allow me to work only 1 or 2 months as probationary periods, I can still have some money. I've sent my applications to several but still get no reply.:frown: People don't seem to like an old talented student - super star.
Why are you on probation?
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #1,686
WWGD said:
Why are you on probation?
Before becoming an employee officially they tend to do so to reduce their pays during the first couple of months and also to test candidates' qualifications or experience. 2 face-to-face interviews plus a paper test can't say anything much.
OK now your turn to tell me why someone is on probation. :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
  • #1,687
Silicon Waffle said:
Before becoming an employee officially they tend to do so to reduce their pays during the first couple of months and also to test candidates' qualifications or experience. 2 face-to-face interviews plus a paper test can't say anything much.
OK now your turn to tell me why someone is on probation. :biggrin:
I am on probation because I hate to dress up. I hate to wear a suit and tie. I wish I could show in casual, even better, with a t-shirt. I am surprised that the usually pragmatic business people continue with the practice of dressing up even though it does not , I believe, help increase the bottom line: I have heard many people who dress up say they cannot wait to get home and change into jeans and a t-shirt. This means they were not feeling comfortable with their clothes while working, which I don't believe is good for productivity.
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #1,688
WWGD said:
I am on probation because I hate to dress up. I hate to wear a suit and tie. I wish I could show in casual, even better, with a t-shirt. I am surprised that the usually pragmatic business people continue with the practice of dressing up even though it does not , I believe, help increase the bottom line: I have heard many people who dress up say they cannot wait to get home and change into jeans and a t-shirt. This means they were not feeling comfortable with their clothes while working, which I don't believe is good for productivity.
Much of dress code depends not only on your job position (such as whether you work with customers or the public on a daily basis) but also just as much on where you live. (The following cartoon applies to east and west coast USA.)

suit1.png


suit2.png


[Source: http://theoatmeal.com/pl/minor_differences5/suit]
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #1,689
Collinsmark is right, it depends on the culture, are you dealing with high level corporate clients? You're going to wear a suit, unless maybe you're in California. I remember our VP coming through our office one day because we dressed casually on days when we dropped into th office and had no client meetings scheduled. He said, ok, you can wear jeans and sweats in here, but you have to have a suit and shoes in your office in case you get a call and need to see a client on short notice. So we all kept a set of work clothes in our offices. I only had to change clothes once, most clients did not need emergency meetings.
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #1,690
After living through three centuries, Jeralean Talley, the world’s oldest woman, has died at age 116.
https://www.yahoo.com/health/jeralean-talley-worlds-oldest-woman-dies-at-116-121851779007.html

Talley, who lived in Inkster, Mich., near Detroit, credited her incredible lifespan to God. The Detroit News reported her saying earlier this year, “Every day is a gift from above. There is nothing we can do without God. He made us, and he knew when he wanted to take us.“

Her active life of fishing, baking walnut pies with nuts from her yard, and gardening began in Montrose, Ga., in 1899. She moved to Michigan with her husband of 52 years, Alfred Talley, in the 1930s.

Jeralean stayed active even into her 100s — bowling until she was 104 and even mowing her own lawn until a few years ago. Family friend Michael Kinloch told Yahoo Health that on a recent walk with him, she said, “I don’t feel bad. I don’t feel sick. I feel as good as you do, and I look as good as you do. I just can’t get around as well as you do.”
May we live so well.
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #1,691
Snippet of conversation I overheard:

"Oh accountable! I thought you said cannibal."
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, ShayanJ and Silicon Waffle
  • #1,692
zoobyshoe said:
Snippet of conversation I overheard:

"Oh accountable! I thought you said cannibal."

Someone I knew, once approached me and some of my friends, and I heard him call me "Cinnamon".
When I asked what prompted him to call me that, he explained that he had actually said; "Gentlemen".
I think we joked about how Cinnamon would be a good drag queen name, if I should ever get bored, and become one.
And from that day forward, he always greeted me as Cinnamon.

ps. According to the Drag Queen Name Generator, Cinnamon is on the list.
 
  • #1,693
Evo said:
Collinsmark is right, it depends on the culture, are you dealing with high level corporate clients? You're going to wear a suit, unless maybe you're in California. I remember our VP coming through our office one day because we dressed casually on days when we dropped into th office and had no client meetings scheduled. He said, ok, you can wear jeans and sweats in here, but you have to have a suit and shoes in your office in case you get a call and need to see a client on short notice. So we all kept a set of work clothes in our offices. I only had to change clothes once, most clients did not need emergency meetings.

I would love to see Obama ( or any other president) addressing congress, both him, all of them, in gym shorts and tee-shirts. While we're at it, why not use advertising in the state of the union or other: " this law will benefit us in the same way Ritz crackers benefits cheese" , displaying the Ritz logo. Or: "I lways bring my Oreos to a filibuster. And I also bring my Clamexopan pills to slow the urge to urinate, so I can conduct my filibuster for 48 hours ". Wouldn't that help pay the national debt? And the Whitehouse plastered with ads for Best Western , CVS, Denny's , etc. (Maybe Trump would buy into it).

That is the casual environment I long for. I can't stand high levels of formality and etiquette.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #1,694
A happy, fortuitous (I may need to retake the GRE, so I am practicing my vocabulary) find: while surfing thru cable (I just have basic), I found out I have the Smithsonian channel in my lineup. Good thing I decided to venture beyond channel 300. I wonder why they cannot line up the channels to avoid having a swath of 100+ channels without any content; out of a total of around 2000 potential channels, only around 400 have actual content. I guess it has to see with the frequency of the signal.

A weird thing is that, I was watching this guy being interviewed and his lips had a fixed downward arch, i.e., when he was relaxed , his lips (actually the entrance to his mouth between the lips) described a downward arch, i.e., the upper-half of a circle. This arching remained for around 45 minutes, so I don't think it was a situational thing. I assume most people's lips describe something close to a horizontal straight line. I don't remember having seen anyone with the "opposite" arching, i.e., someone whose " resting lip expression" is an upward arch, the lower-half of a semicircle, other than, of course, clowns, or the joker..
 
Last edited:
  • #1,695
There seems to have been no fuss made over ARod's 3000th hit. It was a homerun, but the fan who caught it is unwilling to return it.
 
  • #1,696
The very first James Bond: a made for TV movie of Casino Royale from 1954.

The first James Bond, Barry Nelson, leaves something to be desired. The first James Bond villain however, Peter Lorre, was the right idea.

 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #1,697
zoobyshoe said:
The very first James Bond: a made for TV movie of Casino Royale from 1954.

The first James Bond, Barry Nelson, leaves something to be desired. The first James Bond villain however, Peter Lorre, was the right idea.


Oh no, so boring, I thought this was a classic XXX video. o0)
 
  • #1,698
Silicon Waffle said:
Oh no, so boring, I thought this was a classic XXX video. o0)

Maybe you misunderstood the meaning of "something to be desired"?
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #1,699
WWGD said:
Maybe you misunderstood the meaning of "something to be desired"?
?:) Whatever. If I recall correctly, I have never meant anything specific at all except being an online psychopath as always. :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
  • #1,700
zoobyshoe said:
The very first James Bond: a made for TV movie of Casino Royale from 1954.

The first James Bond, Barry Nelson, leaves something to be desired. The first James Bond villain however, Peter Lorre, was the right idea.
Corny dialog from the 1950s, and Nelson seems like he's trying to sound like Humphrey Bogart.
 
  • #1,701
What is it with these people on public bathrooms that, after "doing their thing" , wash their hands
with water, but who use no soap? Best interpretation is that they are partially submitting/ bowing-to peer/societal pressure to be, appear "hygienically correct" .
But if they go as far as using water, why not also use soap, which is a few inches away? Still, I have a record of their faces, and if they work at a restaurant I frequent (and , worse, if they are the cooks), then no soup for me -- I am outta there. Or, if I get to meet them, no handshake.

EDIT: Interestingly, I got a correction (the wiggly red underlining you get when you misspell a word) for writing outtta ( 3 t's) , but none for writing "outta", though neither is an actual English word.
 
Last edited:
  • #1,704
Astronuc said:
Corny dialog from the 1950s, and Nelson seems like he's trying to sound like Humphrey Bogart.
For me it's an extremely interesting historical document, not in spite of the flaws but because of them.

As a James Bond fan, I am intrigued that they thought it would be a good idea to rewrite him as an American (worst idea ever) and that they cast an actor who has no discernible charisma. This has got to be the worst James Bond of all. The woman is O.K. but the best acting comes from Bond's British contact, who is a mere secondary character.

I thought they did a good job of telescoping the book down to a 50 minute teleplay, but, of course, they had to sanitize many "gritty" elements that make the book a nail-biting read, even today.

I can't figure out if it was shot ahead of time and later broadcast, or if it was a live performance, broadcast as it was performed, but it has the sloppy, tentative feel of the latter: long group shots with minimal cuts to closeups, really bad fight scenes with obviously fake punches. Peter Lorre was the right idea for the villain, but he seems to be phoning in too many of his lines, as if they didn't get enough rehearsal time for him to develop some depth to the character.

So, it says volumes about early T.V. and should make people who don't appreciate Sean Connery respect his Bond more: he was an order of magnitude better than Barry Nelson.
 
  • #1,705
Is James Bond still hanging around swimming pools with women in beehive hairstyles whilst sipping expensive champagne or more exotic stuff?
 
  • #1,706
It is pretty notable that the Bond franchise has lasted as long as it has, from around 1969 till today ( at least).
 
  • #1,707
WWGD said:
It is pretty notable that the Bond franchise has lasted as long as it has, from around 1969 till today ( at least).
First was Dr. No in 1962. Latest is Spectre which will come out this year.
 
  • #1,708
I guess 'James Bond' as a concept is sort of similar to relativity.
It's a working formula that nobody has yet been able to replace with an improved model.
(Girls, ahem women, are a constant, they are always observed to be approximately 23 years old within normal margins of error.)
 
Last edited:
  • #1,709
Entitled, "My Irrational Childhood Fear" :
http://www.tickld.com/pic/t/1216674

I actually met a girl who confessed to this. People who see Jaws at a certain young age can apparently develop this phobia.

When I was a kid, it was the movie, The Birds that did it. Kids would become anxious if there was more than one bird on a telephone pole.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,710
zoobyshoe said:
Entitled, "My Irrational Childhood Fear" :
http://www.tickld.com/pic/t/1216674

I actually met a girl who confessed to this. People who see Jaws at a certain young age can apparently develop this phobia.

When I was a kid, it was the movie, The Birds that did it. Kids would become anxious if there was more than one bird on a telephone pole.

I personally have the impression that Hitchcock, King, a few others, were/ are sick f***s that get some therapy out of their films, books and screw many of those who see/read their work. Not that I think they set out to do this, but this is the effect some of their work has. And of course, there is the personal responsibility of the adults who choose to watch those movies. OTOH, some comedians, by their own admission, vent out their pain, trauma, but they do so in a way less likely to hurt others. I never understood those who go watch horror movies. Isnt your life stressful enough as it is? You can't avoid some of the stressors in your life, but you can avoid stress-inducing movies. There is an argument for the cathartic effect, but I does not come off as being very convincing.

EDIT : Sorry if I am being a buzzkill, fuddy-duddy; just that you have to pay $14 for a ticket --of course any food is extra; a popcorn, soda around $12 ( no kidding), so I do my research before going to the movies.

At any rate, I will be wearing my kryptonite --business clothes -- for an interview tomorrow.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3K ·
89
Replies
3K
Views
163K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2K ·
76
Replies
2K
Views
173K
Replies
11K
Views
577K
  • · Replies 2K ·
65
Replies
2K
Views
61K
  • · Replies 3K ·
112
Replies
3K
Views
364K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
504
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K