zoobyshoe
- 6,506
- 1,268
You've never heard of Sherlock Einstein?WWGD said:Wonder if that name Sherlock is used by anyone else, never heard it. Sherlock Fernandez? Sherlock Jones?
You've never heard of Sherlock Einstein?WWGD said:Wonder if that name Sherlock is used by anyone else, never heard it. Sherlock Fernandez? Sherlock Jones?
Is he one of the Einstein bagels brothers?zoobyshoe said:You've never heard of Sherlock Einstein?
No, he's the drummer for the band, Adolf Mussolini.WWGD said:Is he one of the Einstein bagels brothers.
zoobyshoe said:No, he's the drummer for the band, Adolf Mussolini.
I'm sayin' some names get stigmatized for one reason or another, and thereafter not used as much. Be a burden to someone to name them "Sherlock."
Exactly.WWGD said:Luckily there have been no parents with the idea " Oh, Sherlock would be a cool name for my son" , which is equivalent to printing the sentence " Please punch the hell out of me" in the son's forehead when he attends high school.
Here's the scoop:Ibix said:Yesterday I had a Brooklyn Lager - "pre-prohibition style!" according to the can. I was trying to work out what was pre-prohibition about it. Ethanol and no methanol perhaps?
Thanks, Zooby. It wasn't bad beer at all, I must say, and my previous experience with American lager has not been positive. Interesting that thirteen years is all it takes to start such a change in style.zoobyshoe said:Here's the scoop:
http://morebeer.com/brewingtechniques/library/backissues/issue2.3/fix.html
WWGD said:But this may trigger an argument; a coffee shop is not a place where you can reasonably ask someone not to bring a drink to the table.
You don't go to a rodeo and expect not to get dang on your shoes.WWGD said:a coffee shop is not a place where you can reasonably ask someone not to bring a drink to the table.
Call me Ishmael, but everyone probably knows that "Starbuck" was the first mate of the Pequod, the ever-so-reasonable ballast against Captain Ahab's stormy obsessions. It logically(?) follows that Starbuck's would have some essentially reasonable policy for dealing with errant liquids spilled by peg-legged mariners as they are tangled in internet cords and dragged overboard leaving ruined laptops in their wake.JorisL said:I think this is the essence of any reasonable answer.
Still, there could be some level of etiquette where, e.g., anyone with a drink in a table with a laptop could hold the drink in their hands, at leastrbelli1 said:You don't go to a rodeo and expect not to get **** on your shoes.
BoB
BoB's point being, though, that simply using your laptop in a public place exposes it to physical risks. In other news, I found out a few months ago that simply using it in a private place exposes it to physical risks, when I myself spilled a cup of coffee on my laptop here at home. After getting it fixed, I reacted by building a stand for it that elevates it on stilts a couple inches above the desk top, and I keep the keyboard covered with plastic wrap. They make keyboard protectors. You could get one of those. And find some suitable thing to carry with you to set your laptop on that will elevate it above any tsunami from a spilled beverage at Starbuck's. Those measures are more realistic than the ones you're ruminating about.WWGD said:Still, there could be some level of etiquette where, e.g., anyone with a drink in a table with a laptop could hold the drink in their hands, at least
until around just 20% of the drink is left. Then a spillover would happen more slowly and would be easier to control. I do it for you today, you
do it for me next day. But I am not holding my breath.
Tell me about it. Yesterday I came to page 40 of a very good novel from the library only to find pages 41, 42, 43, and 44, had been torn out. I couldn't continue the book without them. That's too big a gap. I took the book back to the library, pointed out the disfigurement, and went to check the shelves for another copy, but there was none. So, I drove 3 or 4 miles to the nearest other library only to find that branch was completely closed from Christmas to NewYears.WWGD said:Life is hard.
zoobyshoe said:Tell me about it. Yesterday I came to page 40 of a very good novel from the library only to find pages 41, 42, 43, and 44, had been torn out. I couldn't continue the book without them. That's too big a gap. I took the book back to the library, pointed out the disfigurement, and went to check the shelves for another copy, but there was none. So, I drove 3 or 4 miles to the nearest other library only to find that branch was completely closed from Christmas to NewYears.
In the meantime, I'm sunk in speculation about why someone would do that to a book. I couldn't think of any reason that was completely rational in my mind.
Person has a two year old?zoobyshoe said:In the meantime, I'm sunk in speculation about why someone would do that to a book. I couldn't think of any reason that was completely rational in my mind.
My first thought, though, was that those pages contained some idea or opinion some crazy person wanted to censor. The library does attract crazy people. The novel is set in Russia so it might have been an anti-religious sentiment that was running through the protagonist's mind, that sort of thing.WWGD said:My guess would be that someone borrowed the book, somehow damaged the pages (maybe s/he was reading it at a Starbucks and someone spilled coffee/tea on it ;) ) in a visible way, then decided to tear them out so that the damage was not visible and return the book without having to pay a penalty.
Ah! Good one. Very plausible and yet it didn't occur to me.Ibix said:Person has a two year old?
? Has a two year old or _is_ (emotionally/developmentally) a two year old?Ibix said:Person has a two year old?
zoobyshoe said:This speculation, in itself, gives me an idea for a novel. In the first chapter the protagonist encounters just such a book, and wonders about the cause of the missing pages. Each subsequent chapter describes a different scenario whereby two leaves of a library book get torn out and the book returned to the library by various different people for different reasons. Then, in the final chapter, all the various people are all brought together in some spectacular situation where something very interesting happens.
It would be titled, hmmm...
Two year olds are very curious and have limited understanding of concepts like "fragile", and their toys and books tend to be quite robust. That's a bad combination of traits and life experience if you happen to have left your adult library book in reach.WWGD said:? Has a two year old or _is_ (emotionally/developmentally) a two year old?
Ibix said:Two year olds are very curious and have limited understanding of concepts like "fragile", and their toys and books tend to be quite robust. That's a bad combination of traits and life experience if you happen to have left your adult library book in reach.
Maybe preferable to have the 2 yr olds Ibix refers to than these ( only chronological) adults near library books. EDIT: Seems Zoobyshoe's theory is a more likely explanation for what happened to the pages of his book.jim hardy said:i took 10 year old nephew to the library. He's fascinated with the outdoorsman lifestyle
The fishing section had been raided by some sort of anti-fishing organization who'd stuffed all the books with leaflets describing the agony imposed on fishes by fishermen.
Nephew asked: "Don't they know what fish do to each other?"
He has a point. It's a good thing most fish don't get big enough to swallow a person.
Interesting you mention this because, in another book I read by the same author, the corpse under investigation died while out fishing.jim hardy said:i took 10 year old nephew to the library. He's fascinated with the outdoorsman lifestyle
The fishing section had been raided by some sort of anti-fishing organization who'd stuffed all the books with leaflets describing the agony imposed on fishes by fishermen.
.
zoobyshoe said:So, let's consider the unlikely but still plausible:
Here's a nice, easy-read essay on that topic:WWGD said:Strange to see , now that temperature has plummeted from the 70's to the 40's , to see people acting as if they were offended, you know, the 70-degree weather was a sort of promise of a lighter Winter that has not been kept (by mother nature, I guess.).
The problem is that in the process of anthropomorphizing, or anecdotalizing, or allegorizing, we can impute agency where it isn’t due. When we teach kids that "electrons follow the path of least resistance" or "genes want to survive," when we insist that there’s a Mother Nature or Father Christmas, we occlude understanding.
It would be nice to have some training available to be able to avoid all biases, or at least to the greatest degree possible. Ironically, those undergoing this training may end up feeling alienated, living in a society with institutions and many other assumptions built on biased, unsupportable assumptions.zoobyshoe said:Here's a nice, easy-read essay on that topic:
http://www.overcomingbias.com/2007/05/the_agency_prob.html
lisab said:Me: Great! I'll get the mandolin. I'll play a little music while you slice potatoes.
I second the motion. PF is actually riddled with people who can play one instrument or another, and it might be fun to start a thread of PF performers. (There'd have to be parameters set, but that's no problem.)DiracPool said:Can you record your performance and post it?![]()
zoobyshoe said:I second the motion. PF is actually riddled with people who can play one instrument or another, and it might be fun to start a thread of PF performers. (There'd have to be parameters set, but that's no problem.)
The truly unbiased would have no bias against the biased. I have had this experience to some small extent. For example, I once spent a wonderful evening drawing with a girl whose world view consisted of pure new age B.S. Despite her whacky ideas, she had a sweet disposition and was exceptionally hot, so I wasn't about to challenge her believe that everything was explained by "frequencies." There is a range of biased people whose company is not unwelcome. I can't characterize that range, but I know 'em when I meet 'em.WWGD said:It would be nice to have some training available to be able to avoid all biases, or at least to the greatest degree possible. Ironically, those undergoing this training may end up feeling alienated, living in a society with institutions and many other assumptions built on biased, unsupportable assumptions.
That would be one of the parameters: the video would have to be 3 minutes or less. No posting your performance of the complete works of Alban Berg transcribed for the bagpipes, sort of thing.DiracPool said:Great idea, are we going to start with your Hammond organ version of "Phantom of the opera"?
5 minutes to go here.zoobyshoe said:A little less than four hours left till "Sherlock."