- 20,815
- 28,456
I've been to an Asia shop yesterday. I now know how peanut sauce for satay is made. There are occasions you do not want to know details.
Serious, I never feel pain there after stretching, except my back and groins when I try to widespread my legs into 2 opposite directions then lower my body until it reaches the floor.Enigman said:Stretching may lead to a pain in the ass.
No, I mean _up until now_, I craved , but , _recently_ I do not crave any more. Just to say that Idid not eat much of it _despite_ craving it. I will try to write a program next time, with all details included to avoid ambiguity. Strictly speaking I should have said that I had largely avoided despite the temptation to give in _u8ntil recently_.zoobyshoe said:I would think that 'losing the appetite for' automatically means 'experiencing no temptation for'.
WWGD said:A nice change: for a few weeks now, I have lost much of my appetite for junkish food (which I largely avoid, but have to fight the temptation*). Hope it remains this way.
The ambiguity comes from the original post employing the present tense where it should have been a past tense: "...I have lost much of my appetite for junkish food (which I largely avoid, but have to fight the temptation*)."WWGD said:No, I mean _up until now_, I craved , but , _recently_ I do not crave any more. Just to say that Idid not eat much of it _despite_ craving it. I will try to write a program next time, with all details included to avoid ambiguity.
I assume that some context can be reasonably filled in if you assume the post is not absurd, which you do not seem to assume, on a consistent basis.zoobyshoe said:The ambiguity comes from the original post employing the present tense where it should have been a past tense: "...I have lost much of my appetite for junkish food (which I largely avoid, but have to fight the temptation*)."
Should have been: "...I have lost much of my appetite for junkish food (which I largely avoided, but had to fight the temptation*)."
zoobyshoe said:I just saw something pretty cool: a flat bed truck carting an antique helicopter somewhere. As a matter of fact, it might even have been an autogyro. It was very small, and had a 1930's or 1940's style to the design. Might have been going to the aerospace museum in Balboa Park.
That is my whole point; "ambiguity" is contextual. Besides, I am not writing an academic paper here, I am not aiming for the highest level of precision. But neither does Zoobyshoe seem to be, as I pointed out in my previous post.fresh_42 said:Would you both consider the possibility that spoken or written language is neither context-free nor unambiguous and we are no push-down automatons?
I know. Very likely I sounded more serious than it was meant to be. I hoped someone jumped on the picture of humans as stack machines ... closing the circle to junk food.WWGD said:That is my whole point; "ambiguity" is contextual. Besides, I am not writing an academic paper here, I am not aiming for the highest level of precision. But neither does Zoobyshoe seem to be, as I pointed out in my previous post.
You mean you are not a shepard to a flock of lamb? Maybe Zoobyshoe can interpret it better :) .lisab said:I think I'm the only meat-eating person I know of who doesn't care for lamb.
Just keep him away from any livestock...do you have any idea what a hungry Zooby is capable of?!WWGD said:You mean you are not a shepard to a flock of lamb? Maybe Zoobyshoe can interpret it better :) .
lisab said:Just keep him away from any livestock...do you have any idea what a hungry Zooby is capable of?!
Me, too.lisab said:I think I'm the only meat-eating person I know of who doesn't care for lamb.
Me two (one for LisaB, one for Fresh, but no for me, so the total , so far, is two), i.e., I like lamb.fresh_42 said:Me, too.
But the portions are so tiny. (I owe you a good laughter on the 'i.e.' part!)WWGD said:Me two (one for LisaB, one for Fresh, but no for me, so the total , so far, is two), i.e., I like lamb.
So your issue is more with portion size than with taste?fresh_42 said:But the portions are so tiny. (I owe you a good laughter on the 'i.e.' part!)
Taste, too, but I admit it's been a long time since I last tried it. My memory on mutton, however, is not really a nice one. So I stay away from sheep and goats. Except for the cheese. I love beef most, even uncooked.WWGD said:So your issue is more with portion size than with taste?
There's a small airfield near us with a couple of autogyros operating out of it. They're kind of cool.zoobyshoe said:I just saw something pretty cool: a flat bed truck carting an antique helicopter somewhere. As a matter of fact, it might even have been an autogyro. It was very small, and had a 1930's or 1940's style to the design. Might have been going to the aerospace museum in Balboa Park.
I would reply to Autogyros re Lisab and Fresh_42's posts: an autogyro as a place where I can prepare my own (Lamb; this is the 'Auto'/self part) gyros (Isn't lamb the usual meat used for gyros?)Ibix said:There's a small airfield near us with a couple of autogyros operating out of it. They're kind of cool.
So you say, but then within a couple posts:EDIT: Common, Zooby, please leave the rigor for the serious forums in PF. Plenty of opportunities to be precise there, let's leave this forum, specially the Random Thoughts part of it, free of demans for rigor, as an outlet.
The main reason I pick on you about grammar or linguistic logic is because of your long history of posts here in which you minutely examine and complain about the same sorts of things.WWGD said:I remember how I would , ridiculously, become annoyed at the fact that the expression ' i.e '., would often appear as i.E , since the writing software would interpret the period after the i in i.e., to denote the end of a sentence and would then go on to capitalize the next letter , ending with i.E . Definitely a first-world complaint.
I've never actually seen one fly. Anyway, this thing went by too fast for me to make out which it was, but it was interestingly old.Ibix said:There's a small airfield near us with a couple of autogyros operating out of it. They're kind of cool.
I am, actually, a sort of unique enforcer because I am specifically trying to help you write better jokes.WWGD said:And there is , IMO, a reasonable time and place for being precise in the areas of grammar and linguistic logic, and a whimsical thread like this one is not one of them. May I respond , reciprocate when I see a complaint on your part, or are you a sort of unique enforcer?
Yes, and gyros means it's sticked on a turning pick. I had immediately to think about food as I read 'autogyros'. There's a Turkey (not the bird) around the corner who serves the Turkish version of it. And I'm getting hungry. Or shall I walk to the Asian diner which is also not far. Or shall I get to the next Drive-In at McDonald's? That comes from debating junk food ...WWGD said:I would reply to Autogyros re Lisab and Fresh_42's posts: an autogyro as a place where I can prepare my own (Lamb; this is the 'Auto'/self part) gyros (Isn't lamb the usual meat used for gyros?)
fresh_42 said:By the way: we call those tiny flying somethings gyrocopter. The emphasis on copter doesn't make you all of a sudden hungry.