Range of a function, very simple & basic question

  • Thread starter Thread starter sachin_naik04
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Range
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the range of two quadratic functions within specified intervals. For the first function, f(x) = 3x² + 4, the range is determined to be 4 ≤ f(x) ≤ 52 by following a systematic approach. The second function, f(x) = 9 - 2x², initially causes confusion, but it is clarified that the steps taken to find the range are correct, specifically regarding squaring the bounds and reversing inequalities when multiplying by negative numbers. The final steps involve adding constants to complete the range calculation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of following each step carefully to achieve the correct answer.
sachin_naik04
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Just go through the following problem

Question 1:find the range of the following function
f(x)=3x2+4 for -4≤x≤3

Answer:
rewriting -4≤x≤3
step1. 0≤x2≤16
step2. multiply 3 for the entire step 1.
step4. add 4 for the entire step1.
step5. 4≤f(x)≤52

so the above problem i have understood

now how do i solve the following problem using the same method as above, because the following problem is a bit different from the first one, and i get a reverse answer

Question 2: find the range of the following function
f(x)=9-2x2 for -3≤x≤3

rewriting -3≤x≤3
step 1. 0≤x2≤9 now is this step correct?, i don't think so.
step 2. ?
step 3. ?
step 4. ?

please note: i cannot find the range directly because each step carries marks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The step is correct. .

if you square x<=3 that will give you (x^2 <=9) or (x<0)
if you square x>=-3 that will give you ((x^2 <= 9) or (x>0))

if both are true you just get (x^2 <= 9)
 
sachin_naik04 said:
Just go through the following problem

Question 1:find the range of the following function
f(x)=3x2+4 for -4≤x≤3

Answer:
rewriting -4≤x≤3
step1. 0≤x2≤16
step2. multiply 3 for the entire step 1.
step4. add 4 for the entire step1.
step5. 4≤f(x)≤52

so the above problem i have understood

now how do i solve the following problem using the same method as above, because the following problem is a bit different from the first one, and i get a reverse answer

Question 2: find the range of the following function
f(x)=9-2x2 for -3≤x≤3

rewriting -3≤x≤3
step 1. 0≤x2≤9 now is this step correct?, i don't think so.
Yes, it is correct. Why would you not think so?

step 2. ?
Multiplying each part of the inequality by negative 2 reverses the inequality:
-18\le x^2\le 0
Since you say you got a "reverse answer" that may have been your mistake.

step 3. ?
Add 9 to each part.

step 4. ?
Write down your answer!

please note: i cannot find the range directly because each step carries marks
 
@HallsofIvy

oh thanks a lot, that helped me
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top