Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the evaluation of various theoretical particle physics programs, specifically focusing on their strengths in high energy theory research. Participants explore rankings, notable faculty, and the relevance of different research areas within high energy physics (HEP), including string theory, field theory, and classical gravity.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest that Stony Brook and Penn State have strong high energy theory research groups.
- There is a distinction made between particle phenomenology and other areas like string theory and classical gravity, with some participants questioning the classification of certain faculty members' research.
- Concerns are raised about the mainstream status of loop quantum gravity compared to string theory, with some participants asserting that classical gravity is mainstream but loop quantum gravity is less so.
- Illinois-Urbana Champaign's HEPT program is mentioned as being less renowned compared to others like Stony Brook and Penn State, with a focus on condensed matter research.
- Participants discuss application deadlines for various programs, noting that UC Davis still accepts applications beyond its priority deadline.
- Several hot topics in classical gravity research are identified, including higher order self-force corrections and stability problems for black holes.
- The Perimeter Scholars International program is mentioned as highly selective, with a reputation for being elite in theoretical physics education.
- Some participants emphasize the importance of scientific merit over program rankings in evaluating potential graduate programs.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the strengths and rankings of various programs, with no consensus reached on which programs are definitively the best for theoretical particle physics. The discussion includes multiple competing perspectives on the relevance and mainstream status of different research areas.
Contextual Notes
Participants reference specific faculty and their research areas, highlighting the complexity of categorizing programs based on faculty expertise. There are also mentions of application deadlines that vary by program, which may influence decisions for prospective students.
Who May Find This Useful
Prospective graduate students interested in theoretical particle physics and high energy theory research may find this discussion relevant, particularly those evaluating program strengths and faculty expertise.