Rate of change of current with time, galvanometer deflection

Click For Summary
A solenoid with an inductance of 2.0 H connected to a 2.0 V DC supply and a 0.5 Ω resistor will reach a final current of 4.0 A, with an initial rate of change of current of 1.0 A/s. When the current is 2.0 A, the rate of change of current is calculated to be 0.5 A/s. The discussion also covers the behavior of a secondary coil connected to a ballistic galvanometer, where a current of 4.0 A switched off in the primary solenoid results in a galvanometer deflection of 268 divisions. The importance of understanding the step response of a series R-L circuit is emphasized for solving these problems accurately.
  • #31
moenste said:
Φ = B A or Φ = B A N?
Which do you think is correct and why?
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
kuruman said:
Which do you think is correct and why?
We have the number of turns, so Φ = B A N.
 
  • #33
Correct. Now can you find a general expression for the induced current in the secondary when the flux through it is changing? Just an expression, don't worry about the numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #34
kuruman said:
Correct. Now can you find a general expression for the induced current in the secondary when the flux through it is changing? Just an expression, don't worry about the numbers.
Something like Φ = B I A N?
 
  • #35
moenste said:
Something like Φ = B I A N?
We have already agreed that Φ = B A N. You can't have Φ = B I A N at the same time.

Answer me this: The secondary is not connected to a battery or power supply. Why should there be a current in it?
 
  • Like
Likes cnh1995 and moenste
  • #36
kuruman said:
We have already agreed that Φ = B A N. You can't have Φ = B I A N at the same time.

Answer me this: The secondary is not connected to a battery or power supply. Why should there be a current in it?
Because they are close together and have mutual inductance?
 
  • #37
moenste said:
Because they are close together and have mutual inductance?
Yes they have mutual inductance, but the mutual inductance by itself does not cause a current to flow in the secondary. What causes the induced current flow?
Please read and understand this, then try answering the question again.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/farlaw.html
 
  • Like
Likes moenste and cnh1995
  • #38
kuruman said:
Yes they have mutual inductance, but the mutual inductance by itself does not cause a current to flow in the secondary. What causes the induced current flow?
Please read and understand this, then try answering the question again.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/farlaw.html
We find V first: V = I R = 4 * 60 = 240 V. Then we find d Φ / d t: E = - N (d Φ / d t) → d Φ / d t = 240 / 2000 = 0.12 Wb s-1.

Now we need to somehow find the magnetic field from flux, though we don't know time.

And then we use θ = a N B A / R to find the deflection θ.
 
  • #39
moenste said:
We find V first: V = I R = 4 * 60 = 240 V.
You can't say this. The 4.0 A is the current in the primary and the 60 Ω is the total resistance in the secondary. You don't know how much current flows in the secondary but you can write an algebraic expression for it in terms of the induced emf. What is that expression? (No numbers please, just symbols.)
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #40
kuruman said:
You can't say this. The 4.0 A is the current in the primary and the 60 Ω is the total resistance in the secondary. You don't know how much current flows in the secondary but you can write an algebraic expression for it in terms of the induced emf. What is that expression? (No numbers please, just symbols.)
Maybe something like I = E / R = - (1 / R) * (d / d t) * (N Φ), where E = - (d / d t) * (N Φ)?
 
  • #41
That's what you want, ## I = \frac{1}{R} \frac{d\Phi}{dt}##. The negative sign can be dropped because we looking for magnitudes. Remember, we are looking for the total charge that flows in the secondary. We just found an expression for the current in the secondary. How is the current related to the charge in the secondary?
 
  • Like
Likes moenste and cnh1995
  • #42
kuruman said:
That's what you want, ## I = \frac{1}{R} \frac{d\Phi}{dt}##. The negative sign can be dropped because we looking for magnitudes. Remember, we are looking for the total charge that flows in the secondary. We just found an expression for the current in the secondary. How is the current related to the charge in the secondary?
But we don't know I and B in it Why do we need it?
 
  • #43
moenste said:
But we don't know I and B
I think you do know B (and Φ) in the secondary. The secondary has the same area of 8cm2 as you said in an earlier post.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #44
moenste said:
But we don't know I and B in it Why do we need it?
As @cnh1995 remarked, you know B and therefore Φ. Maybe, just maybe, you don't need I, so just answer my question "How is the current related to the charge in the secondary?"
 
  • Like
Likes moenste and cnh1995
  • #45
cnh1995 said:
I think you do know B (and Φ) in the secondary. The secondary has the same area of 8cm2 as you said in an earlier post.
But no B is given in the problem. And all my calculations here are wrong:
moenste said:
(b) As I understand we need to find θ: θ = a N A B / R, where a is the division per microcoulomb, N = turns, A = cross-sectional area, B = magnetic field and R = resistance. If this formula is correct, I'm not sure how to find B. Maybe something like: B = μ0 n I = 4 π * 10-7 * 1000 * 4 = 5 * 10-3 T. Then plug into the formula: θ = 2 * 2000 * (8 * 10-4) * (5 * 10-3) / 60 = 2.68 * 10-4. It has the 2.68 in it as in the answer 268 divisions. But still I'm not sure whether I'm in the right direction.

kuruman said:
As @cnh1995 remarked, you know B and therefore Φ. Maybe, just maybe, you don't need I, so just answer my question "How is the current related to the charge in the secondary?"
Q charge = M I / R, where M is standard mutual inductance.
 
  • #46
moenste said:
But no B is given in the problem. And all my calculations here are wrong:
You can calculate B. You have the sufficient data to calculate B and Φ.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #47
moenste said:
Q charge = M I / R, where M is standard mutual inductance.
No. What is the general relationship between charge and current?
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #48
cnh1995 said:
No. What is the general relationship between charge and current?
If you don't remember look it up.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #49
cnh1995 said:
You can calculate B. You have the sufficient data to calculate B and Φ.
B = μ0 n I = 4 π * 10-7 * 1000 * 4 = 5 * 10-3 T.

cnh1995 said:
No. What is the general relationship between charge and current?
Q = I t.
 
  • #50
No, look it up.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #51
To clarify my previous post, you need a general expression that is valid when the charge and current vary with time.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #52
kuruman said:
To clarify my previous post, you need a general expression that is valid when the charge and current vary with time.
I = d Q / d t?
 
  • #53
Correct. So put together to get a differential equation using the alternate expression for I, Post #41.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #54
moenste said:
I = d Q / d t?
Right.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #55
kuruman said:
Correct. So put together to get a differential equation using the alternate expression for I, Post #41.
d Q / d t = (1 / R) (d Φ / d t)

d (B A N / R) / d t = (1 / R) (d B A N / d t)
d (μ0 N I A N / R) / d t = (1 / R) (d μ0 N I A N / d t).
 
  • #56
Multiply both sides of the first equation by dt and integrate. What do you get?
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #57
kuruman said:
Multiply both sides of the first equation by dt and integrate. What do you get?
d Q = (d t / R) d Φ
Q = t Φ / R?
 
  • #58
No. You have an extra dt on the right that doesn't belong.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #59
moenste said:
d Q = (d t / R) d Φ
Q = t Φ / R?
Time term should not show up in the equation. That's why you were asked to multiply both the sides by dt. That will eliminate the time variable.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #60
kuruman said:
No. You have an extra dt on the right that doesn't belong.
cnh1995 said:
Time term should not show up in the equation. That's why you were asked to multiply both the sides by dt. That will eliminate the time variable.
Q = Φ / R = B A N / R?
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
945
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
783
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K