Rate of gas leakage through small hole

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the rate of gas leakage through a small hole in a cylinder containing helium at 10 atmospheres pressure. Participants emphasize the importance of considering the change in density and the velocity of gas molecules normal to the hole. The correct approach involves using the relationship between molecular velocity, area, and density to derive the outflow rate, while also acknowledging that the problem requires calculus to account for changing density over time. The final mass loss rate is derived as a function of density and velocity, leading to a more accurate understanding of gas flow dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gas laws and behavior under pressure
  • Familiarity with calculus for modeling changing variables
  • Knowledge of molecular velocity and its relation to density
  • Basic principles of fluid dynamics, particularly regarding gas flow through openings
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the ideal gas law and its implications for gas density and pressure
  • Learn about the derivation of flow rates in fluid dynamics, specifically for gases
  • Explore the concept of molecular velocity distributions in ideal gases
  • Investigate the application of Bernoulli's principle in gas flow scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, researchers in fluid dynamics, and professionals working with gas systems who need to understand gas leakage rates and their calculations.

rohanlol7
Messages
66
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Here http://imgur.com/a/4LRM6

upload_2016-8-13_13-21-9.png


2. Homework Equations

The equation is given int he question

The Attempt at a Solution



gas will stop flowing when the pressure inside the gas is equal to that of the surroundings. I calculated the final mass of gas inside the cube. Then i calculated the change in mass of the gas and i got that to be c^2*L^3/3*(1/p-1/Po) then i divided by t and converted L/t=c. However i don't think this is correct as i don't see why the rate of flow of gas should be constant and also my answer seems to be independent of a which seems counter intuitive.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your approach looks questionable.
You're not interested in what happens after pressures equalize. You're interested in the outflow of gas due to the delta in the partial pressure between the inside & outside. The assumption is that outside the box the partial pressure of the gas is zero. So I would consider the component of gas molecules' velocity normal to the side containing the hole, then velocity times area times density = outflow rate.
 
rude man said:
Your approach looks questionable.
You're not interested in what happens after pressures equalize. You're interested in the outflow of gas due to the delta in the partial pressure between the inside & outside. The assumption is that outside the box the partial pressure of the gas is zero. So I would consider the component of gas molecules' velocity normal to the side containing the hole, then velocity times area times density = outflow rate.
I agree my approach was dumb. I figured out that the rate flow is proportional to the density, however I can't seem to figure out what to do from there since the density is changing. I can figure out the change in density of the gas in a time t and then I'm stuck
 
On the oth
rohanlol7 said:
I agree my approach was dumb. I figured out that the rate flow is proportional to the density, however I can't seem to figure out what to do from there since the density is changing. I can figure out the change in density of the gas in a time t and then I'm stuck
other hand I was able to derive an equation for the no of moles of gas left in the cube as a function of time. ( I got an exponential decay) but I guess this doesn't quite help me
 
rohanlol7 said:
On the oth

other hand I was able to derive an equation for the no of moles of gas left in the cube as a function of time. ( I got an exponential decay) but I guess this doesn't quite help me
EDIT: thinking more about it I guess since the size of the box was given we should compute density ρ and flow rate as functions of time.

But the approach is the same: compute the normal velocity as a function of ρ, then compute flow rate, then ρ decreases with flow rate which reduces flow rate etc. Calculus involved.

Also I would forget no. of moles. Stick with kg since you're given the expression for the molecular velocity as a function of density (assumed in in kg/m3.)
 
Last edited:
Looking at this some more, it appears that not enough info is given.

It's obvious that you need to solve for initial density ρ0 and molecular velocity c0 somehow. But even if initial pressure p0 were given, which it isn't, that does not suffice to determine ρ0 and c0, obviously. And even if temperature were given, that would give us number of moles but not density.

So i would proceed by ignoring the given formula, assuming initial values ρ0 and c0, then solving for flow rate dm/dt which will be a function of t.
 
rude man said:
since the size of the box was given we should compute density ρ and flow rate as functions of time.
I think the size of the box was specified as l merely in order to write l>>√a. I don't think it is supposed to feature in the answer.
rude man said:
Looking at this some more, it appears that not enough info is given.
... unless we are to assume current pressure p etc. It is not in terms of initial state, merely current state.
 
rude man said:
EDIT: thinking more about it I guess since the size of the box was given we should compute density ρ and flow rate as functions of time.

But the approach is the same: compute the normal velocity as a function of ρ, then compute flow rate, then ρ decreases with flow rate which reduces flow rate etc. Calculus involved.

Also I would forget no. of moles. Stick with kg since you're given the expression for the molecular velocity as a function of density (assumed in in kg/m3.)
I think that's the right approach to the problem
 
However all these approaches seem fine but, there is a next part to the question and this makes no sense unless what its asking me to calculate is the INITIAL flow rate!
A cylinder that contains helium has a diameter of 300 mm and a length of 1.5 m. The pressure of the gas in the cylinder is 10 atmospheres above the ambient air pressure. There is a small hole in the piston, diameter 2 mm. Calculate the rate of fall of pressure in the cylinder assuming that the expansion is isothermal.
 
  • #10
and the funnier thing is that the answer kind of needs to be independent of the velocity of the particles which is weirder
 
  • #11
Sorry for the delay. rude man and I were having a side discussion. It bothers me that the hole might not be sufficiently small to ignore bulk flow (Bernoulli style) and just treat it as pure diffusion. However, it looks like that is what is expected here.

I started by checking my ideas by deriving the given equation from first principles. Consider a gas of atoms mass m between two parallel plates area A a small distance h apart. Consider one moving at speed v at an angle theta to the normal to the plates.
The probability density of such an angle is sin(theta).
The momentum change normal to the plate on striking it is 2 mv cos(theta).
The frequency with which the atom strikes the same plate is v cos(theta)/2h.
The total number of atoms is ##\rho Ah/m##.
Putting all this together, the force on a plate is ##\int _0^{\pi/2}\rho \frac{Ah}m\frac{v\cos(\theta)}{2h}\sin(\theta)2mv\cos(\theta).d\theta = \frac 13\rho Av^2##.
Since c is the rms speed, the pressure is ##\frac 13\rho c^2##.
So far so good.

The escape rate through a hole area A would be the rate at which atoms would strike that area. This is the same integral as above, but leaving out the factor for momentum change per atom strike.

By this method, I get a mass loss rate of ##\frac 18\rho Av##.
But this is awkward since the average v is not c. So we need to plug in the distribution of speeds in an ideal gas.

@rude man , do you see any flaw in that?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K