Rationalizing the numerator with limits

  • Thread starter Thread starter robertjford80
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the legality of a mathematical step involving limits and rationalization. The user questions the terminology used, clarifying that the process is actually factoring rather than rationalizing. They demonstrate that substituting values for z and x yields valid results, provided both are nonnegative. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying mathematical operations to avoid confusion. Overall, the focus is on understanding the manipulation of expressions in limit problems.
robertjford80
Messages
388
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Screenshot2012-05-22at123618AM.png




The Attempt at a Solution



I don't see how the above step is legal. I plugged in 4 for z and 9 for z and it works, but what is this move called? it's neither rationalizing the numerator nor rationalizing the denominator.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's called factoring. z-x=(sqrt(z)-sqrt(x))*(sqrt(z)+sqrt(x)). It should work ok as long as z and x are nonnegative. I think you can assume that because otherwise your numerator isn't very well defined.
 
FOIL the denominator in the second step and you'll get back what you started with.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
999
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K