RC Circuits: Measuring Capacitance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a misunderstanding of how to measure capacitance in RC circuits. The original poster incorrectly assumed that the slope of the T versus R graph directly indicates capacitance. However, the correct approach involves measuring the time constant τ, which is related to capacitance through the formula τ = RC. Instead, the poster measured T_{1/2}, which requires a different derivation to relate it to R and C. Clarifying this distinction is essential for accurate capacitance measurement in RC circuits.
amwil
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
To measure the capacitance C of a capacitor, you attach the capacitor to a battery and wait until it is fully charged. You then disconnect the capacitor from the battery and let it discharge through a resistor of resistance R. You measure the time T1/2 that it takes the voltage across the resistor to decrease to half its initial value at the instant that the connection to the capacitor is first completed. You repeat this for several different resistors. You plot the data as T1/2 versus R and find that they lie close to a straight line that has slope 4.00 μF.
What is the capacitance C of the capacitor?
Relevant Equations
T=RC
I thought that if the slope of the T versus R graph is 4.00μF, then the capacitance would be 4.00μF but it says that's wrong. I know I'm doing something wrong but I'm not sure how to approach this problem. Can someone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have measured the time constant ##\tau = RC## and plotted ##\tau## vs. R, you would indeed find the slope to correspond to ##C##, but you didn't measure ##\tau##. You measured ##T_{1/2}##. Try deriving an expression for ##T_{1/2}## in terms of ##R## and ##C##.
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn and DaveE
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top