Reading a lot of maths make me hungry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reading
AI Thread Summary
Reading mathematics often triggers hunger due to the brain's high glucose consumption during cognitive tasks. Engaging in complex mathematical concepts, such as path integrals, can lead to a craving for food, prompting suggestions to eat before exercising. Personal experiences shared highlight a connection between different branches of mathematics and food preferences, with some associating analysis with gourmet meals and algebra with simpler fare. The discussion also touches on the pressures of studying advanced mathematics, leading to stress-induced eating habits. Additionally, humor is injected into the conversation with references to mathematicians and their coffee consumption, alongside playful mentions of prizes for mathematical problems. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the interplay between mental exertion in mathematics and physical hunger.
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
Is it just me?

But reading a lot of maths stuff makes me hungry, it's a good thing that I exercise regularly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MathematicalPhysicist said:
Is it just me?

But reading a lot of maths stuff makes me hungry, it's a good thing that I exercise regularly.

How does that statement follow? Exercising just sounds like it would make you even more hungry. The solution is to eat.

The brain burns glucose to do its work. Most of burning involves the Krebs or TCA cycle in order to manufacture ATP, which is utilized by neuronal cell respiration in order to feul the ion pumps that maintain membrane polarity. Maintaining this polarity allows the signals to do their thing in your brain networks. The more you use your brain, the more glucose you burn and the hungrier you get.

So next time you get hungry after doing a particularly hairy path integral, make an egg salad sandwhich and save the jog for later.
 
DiracPool said:
How does that statement follow? Exercising just sounds like it would make you even more hungry. The solution is to eat.

The brain burns glucose to do its work. Most of burning involves the Krebs or TCA cycle in order to manufacture ATP, which is utilized by neuronal cell respiration in order to feul the ion pumps that maintain membrane polarity. Maintaining this polarity allows the signals to do their thing in your brain networks. The more you use your brain, the more glucose you burn and the hungrier you get.

So next time you get hungry after doing a particularly hairy path integral, make an egg salad sandwhich and save the jog for later.

Well, I lost something like 25-30 KG because I started exercising, I ain't going to put more weight anytime soon.
 
Analysis, algebra or geometry?
 
I like them all.

But geometry and analysis are more interesting to me.
 
I mean, which makes you hungry?
 
After analysis I might have duck consommé, pasta roulade with escargot farce, presse de pintade and for dessert, ginger infused mango. For a wine, I rather favor a Veuve Fourny, Vertus than the more expensive Jaques Selosse, "Initiale". Algebra is best with something like a hotdog with sauerkraut and a coke.
 
Last edited:
Jimmy Snyder said:
After analysis I might have duck consommé, pasta roulade with escargot farce, presse de pintade and for dessert, ginger infused mango. For a wine, I rather favor a Veuve Fourny, Vertus than the more expensive Jaques Selosse, "Initiale". Algebra is best with something like a hotdog with sauerkraut and a coke.

Hmmm, maybe I should make another attempt at Rudin ...

BTW, Americans have sauerkraut?
 
Analysis does make me hungry that's for sure; can't say the same about Geometry though. Micro's been threatening to make me do Conway if I don't stick to Reed and Simon and just the pressure itself is making me eat boatloads of ice cream. MAKE IT STOP T_T
 
  • #10
Is there a difference between reading and doing?

I've heard it said that a mathematician is a machine for turning coffee into theorems.

I think Banach was supposed to be the exception? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_Café

http://kielich.amu.edu.pl/Stefan_Banach/pdf/ks-szkocka/ks-szkocka3ang.pdf

Problem 106
Prize: One bottle of wine, S. Banach.

Problem 152
For computation of the frequency: 100 grammes of caviar
For proof of the existence of frequency: a small beer
For counterexample: a demitasse

Problem 153
Prize: A live goose, Mazur

Looks like Jimmy Snyder got it right!
 
Last edited:
  • #12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=?v=ZdWMJW5qpOI


Looks as though reading a lot of maths makes him musical. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
41
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top