Real Analysis HELP: Measurable Functions on Measure Subspace

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the existence of measurable functions \( f_n \) defined on a measure subspace where \( f_n \) converges to \( f \) almost everywhere (a.e.), yet \( f \) itself is not measurable. The key insight is that a measure space can be constructed where a subset of a measurable set of measure zero is not measurable, particularly using the Borel measure on the Cantor set. The Cantor function is suggested as a potential candidate for constructing these functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of measurable functions and measure spaces
  • Familiarity with the concept of convergence almost everywhere (a.e.)
  • Knowledge of Borel measures and their properties
  • Basic concepts of the Cantor set and its characteristics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Borel measures and their completeness
  • Research the construction of non-measurable sets within measure spaces
  • Examine the Cantor function and its implications in measure theory
  • Explore examples of functions that converge a.e. but are not measurable
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, graduate students in real analysis, and anyone studying measure theory and its applications in functional analysis.

Smiling
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that there exists measurable functions f_n defined on some measure subspace, st f_n-> f a.e. but such that f is not measurable.

Homework Equations



Converges a.e. means that converges everywhere except on a set of measure zero.

The Attempt at a Solution


Need to construct a measure space in which some subset of a measurable set of measure zero is not measurable. However, such measure space is not compelte.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I know that I need to construct a measure space in which some subset of a measurable set of measure zero is not measurable. However, such measure space is not complete.
It seems that there is a subset of the Cantor set that is not borel measurable...so, if you choose the Borel measure, then you know it is not complete and that m(Cantor set)=0...
I am not sure how to choose the function though...maybe choose the Cantor function?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K