Proving the Lemma for Bounded Sets in Real Analysis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the lemma that states limsup(s_n + t_n) ≤ limsup(s_n) + limsup(t_n) for bounded sequences (s_n) and (t_n). Participants emphasize the importance of using the characterization of limsup, defined as limsup_{n→∞}x_n = lim_{N→∞}(sup_{n>N}x_n). The conversation highlights the need to first establish that sup(A + B) ≤ sup(A) + sup(B) for two sets of real numbers A and B. The final conclusion confirms that limsup(a_n + b_n) ≤ limsup(a_n) + limsup(b_n) is valid based on the properties of suprema.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bounded sequences in real analysis
  • Familiarity with the concept of limsup in sequences
  • Knowledge of supremum and its properties
  • Basic principles of convergence in real analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of limsup and its applications in real analysis
  • Explore the proof techniques for inequalities involving suprema
  • Investigate the convergence of sequences and their limits
  • Learn about the implications of boundedness in sequences and functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on real analysis, as well as anyone looking to deepen their understanding of limits and supremum properties in bounded sequences.

steelphantom
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that limsup(s_n + t_n) <= limsup(s_n) + limsup(t_n) for bounded sequences (s_n) and (t_n).

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


My book gives a hint that says to first show that sup{s_n + t_n : n > N} <= sup{s_n : n > N} + sup{t_n : n > N}. I'm not really even sure how to do that. Any ideas? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
steelphantom said:
My book gives a hint that says to first show that sup{s_n + t_n : n > N} <= sup{s_n : n > N} + sup{t_n : n > N}. I'm not really even sure how to do that. Any ideas? Thanks!

Hi steelphantom! :smile:

sup{} can really only apply to a finite set, so I think the book must mean show that sup{s_n + t_n : n < N} ≤ sup{s_n : n < N} + sup{t_n : n < N}.

Can you do that? :smile:
 
?? What makes you say the "sup" only applies to a finite set? If, for example, sn= 1/n, Then sup{sn: n> N} is 1/N.
 
tiny-tim, what do you mean by "sup{} can really only apply to a finite set"? For instance, sup{[0,1]}=1, yet [0,1] is an infinite set.

steelphantom, ok, so clearly the book wants you to use the characterizations of limsup

\limsup_{n\rightarrow +\infty}x_n=\lim_{N\rightarrow+\infty}\left(\sup_{n&gt; N}x_n\right)

Following the hint of the book, try to show that more generally, for A, B two sets of real numbers,

\sup(A+B)\leq \sup(A)+\sup(B)

Let \{a_n+b_n\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence in A+B converging to sup(A+B) [show such a sequence must exist if you haven't done it already]. Then clearly, a_n\leq\sup(A) and b_n\leq\sup(B) for all n, hence... (you finish)
 
quasar987 said:
tiny-tim, what do you mean by "sup{} can really only apply to a finite set"? For instance, sup{[0,1]}=1, yet [0,1] is an infinite set.

steelphantom, ok, so clearly the book wants you to use the characterizations of limsup

\limsup_{n\rightarrow +\infty}x_n=\lim_{N\rightarrow+\infty}\left(\sup_{n&gt; N}x_n\right)

Following the hint of the book, try to show that more generally, for A, B two sets of real numbers,

\sup(A+B)\leq \sup(A)+\sup(B)

Let \{a_n+b_n\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence in A+B converging to sup(A+B) [show such a sequence must exist if you haven't done it already]. Then clearly, a_n\leq\sup(A) and b_n\leq\sup(B) for all n, hence... (you finish)

Thanks for the help! Let's see if I got it...

limsup(a_n + b_n) = sup(A + B) = lim(a_n + b_n) = lim(a_n) + lim(b_n). Since (a_n), (b_n) are <= sup(A), sup(B), respectively, then so are lim(a_n) and lim(b_n). So we have limsup(a_n + b_n) <= sup(A) + sup(B). But we have sup(A) = sup(a_n) = limsup(a_n) and sup(B) = sup(b_n) = limsup(b_n).

Finally, we get limsup(a_n + b_n) <= limsup(a_n) + limsup(b_n).

Is this correct, or am I assuming too much? Thanks again.
 
You are assuming way too much and complicating things way too much. And I also think you'Re confusing the problems at hand.

First concentrate on proving the little lemma I outlined for you (namely, for A, B two arbitrary sets of real numbers, \sup(A+B)\leq \sup(A)+\sup(B)), and then worry about solving your problem involving limsups of the sequence s_n and t_n.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K