Real Analysis - Prove the following: inf A = -sup(-A)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving a relationship between the infimum of a set of real numbers and the supremum of its negation. Specifically, it states that for a nonempty set A of real numbers that is bounded below, the infimum of A is equal to the negative of the supremum of the set containing the negations of its elements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definitions of infimum and supremum, with one suggesting to prove two inequalities to establish the desired result. Others question the validity of the original poster's reasoning and suggest clarifying the relationship between bounds of A and -A.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing different approaches to tackle the proof. Some guidance has been offered regarding inequalities that may lead to the conclusion, but there is no explicit consensus on the method to be used.

Contextual Notes

There is a reference to a specific textbook and a problem number, indicating that the discussion is grounded in formal mathematical analysis. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their assumptions and the legality of their steps in the proof.

jmac85
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let A be a nonempty set of real numbers which is bounded below. Let -A be the set of all numbers -x, where x is in A. Prove that:
inf A = -Sup(-A)

Homework Equations



What should I use as a starting statement? I understand that its true. It makes sense in my head but I can't get it out on paper. l believe this to be right, although I'm not sure if my assumptions are correct or if what I did is actually legal to do. This is from Rudin's Principlese of Mathematical Analysis - Page 22 - Problem 6


The Attempt at a Solution



By definition --
inf A --> x <= y where y is in A
sup(-A) --> -x >= -y where y is in A

Thus --
-sup(-A) --> -(-x >= -y) --> x <= y

So we see --
-sup(-A) --> x <= y where y is in A

Therefore --
inf A = -sup(-A)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you've done is show that the negative of a lower bound of A is an upper bound of -A. But you haven't proven that the negative of the greatest lower bound is the least upper bound of -A.
 
You may want to approach the problem by proving these 2 inequalities :

1) inf(A) <= -sup(-A) , or equivalently, sup(-A) <= -inf(A)

2) inf(A) >= -sup(-A)

Combining these 2 inequalities will give you the desired result.
 
Start with definition of infimum and supremum.
Then take sup A where A is a set of real numbers.
Define a set B = -A. Take inf of B.
 
Thank you all! I'll be working on the problem again tonight, this time with some new things to try!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K