Real component of the wavelength of microwaves in copper

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the real component of the wavelength of microwaves in copper, utilizing the equation n² = er = -iσ/ε₀ω, where σ represents the conductivity of copper, ε₀ is the permittivity of free space, and ω is the microwave frequency. The user expresses uncertainty in extracting the real part of the refractive index due to the presence of the imaginary unit 'i'. It is established that for microwaves, the imaginary component dominates, but the real part becomes significant near plasma resonance. The Drude model is recommended as a method to simulate the behavior of copper in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex refractive index concepts
  • Familiarity with the Drude model of electrical conduction
  • Knowledge of microwave frequency parameters
  • Basic principles of electromagnetism and wave propagation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Drude model for copper and its constants
  • Learn about the relationship between conductivity and refractive index
  • Explore the effects of plasma resonance on metal behavior
  • Study the mathematical derivation of the refractive index in complex media
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and materials scientists interested in microwave interactions with conductive materials, particularly those studying the optical properties of metals like copper.

buttons123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am trying to work out the real component of the wavelength of microwaves in copper. I am given n2=er=-i sigma/eo omega

where n is the refactive index
er is the relative permitivity
eo is the permitivity of free space
i = sqrt(-1)
omega is the frequency of the microwave
sigma is the conductivity of copper

I was approaching this by using n=kc/omega where k is the wavenumber and then c=f*wavelength but I am not sure about obtaining the real part of the refractive index as the whole value is multiplied by i?

Any ideas or examples/links would be helpful.
 
Science news on Phys.org
For microwaves it really doesn't matter as the imaginary part is much much larger than the real part. The real part does become more significant as we go above microwaves and approach the plasma resonance of the metal. If you really want to find the real part, I would suggest finding the Drude model for copper that simulates it as having a plasma resonance. I do not know off hand what the constants are for copper in the model.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
31K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
61K