Real life elastic collision and variation of kinetic energy

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the criteria for determining when a collision can be considered elastic, particularly in real-life scenarios. It explores the concept of elastic collisions, the significance of the time interval ##\Delta T##, and the acceptable error margins in energy measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how small ##\Delta T## should be for a collision to be classified as elastic, noting that only atomic collisions are typically regarded as perfectly elastic.
  • Another participant suggests that ##\Delta T## should be small enough that the error from ignoring it is negligible for the intended application.
  • A participant proposes using a criterion where if the percentage of ##\Delta T## from the initial time ##T_i## is less than 10%, it could be considered acceptable, although they express uncertainty about this approach.
  • It is noted that tolerating a 10% error in energy measurements may be acceptable, but the definition of a purely elastic collision is described as an approximation, with no definitive answer on the usefulness of approximations depending on context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the criteria for classifying collisions as elastic, with no consensus reached on a specific threshold for ##\Delta T## or error margins.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on specific applications and the subjective nature of what constitutes an acceptable approximation in the context of elastic collisions.

velvetmist
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
How small should ##\Delta T## be in a collision to be considered elastic? In elastic collisions ##\Delta T =0##, but as far as I know, just atomic collisions are considered perfectly elastic. Then, which criterias are used to considere a collision between two objects elastic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It should be small enough that you don't care about the error from ignoring it for whatever your application is.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: velvetmist
Ibix said:
It should be small enough that you don't care about the error from ignoring it for whatever your application is.
I don't have any specific application. I was thinking in taking the percentage of ##\Delta T## from ##T_i##, and if it's ##<10\%## it's acceptable, but I'm not sure if it could be a valid criteria.
 
If you can tolerate an error of 10% in your energy measure, sure.

A purely elastic collision is an approximation to reality. There's no single answer to "how good does an approximation have to be to be useful" - it depends on how big the error is and how precise an answer you need.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: velvetmist

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K