Problem with understanding angular momentum

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the understanding of angular momentum, particularly in the context of elastic collisions and the behavior of objects in circular motion. Participants explore the relationships between mass, radius, velocity, and kinetic energy, as well as the implications of conservation laws in these scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the angular momentum equation (mrv) and its dependence on radius, questioning how different radii affect the velocities of colliding spheres.
  • Another participant challenges the initial formulation of angular momentum, suggesting that the centers of rotation must be the same for valid comparisons.
  • There is a proposal that the conservation of kinetic energy might be more applicable in certain cases, especially in elastic collisions.
  • Some participants discuss the behavior of a stick attached to a pivot, raising questions about how angular momentum conservation applies to different parts of the stick and their velocities.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of moving mass closer to the pivot and how this affects angular velocity and speed, with some participants asserting that angular momentum conservation leads to increased speed as mass is retracted.
  • One participant introduces the concept of exerting force to change the motion of a particle in a circular path, suggesting that this can lead to increased speed as the particle moves inward.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to understanding the problem, with multiple competing views on the applicability of angular momentum versus kinetic energy in different scenarios. The discussion remains unresolved with ongoing questions and challenges to various claims.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of defining reference points for angular momentum calculations and the conditions under which conservation laws apply. There are also discussions about the assumptions underlying the behavior of rigid bodies and the effects of external forces.

  • #31
vanhees71 said:
You should use vectors always. It can only lead to confusion, if you try to learn mechanics without vectors.
Particularly when studying angular momentum, which requires motion in at least two dimensions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
864
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K