Real Numbers: Show Base b Analogy Properties

  • Thread starter Thread starter Diffy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Base
Diffy
Messages
441
Reaction score
0
Question:
Decimal (10-nary) expansions of real numbers were defined by special reference to the number 10. Show that the real numbers have b-nary expansions with analogous properties, where b is any integer greater than 1.

Attempt at solution:
I think if I show that there is a bijective function between the real numbers base ten, and any other base that will show they have analogous properties.

so let a0.a1a2... be any real number, where a0is any integer and ai i >0 and i /in {0,1,2,...,9}.

Then it has been shown (in the book) that this can be represented as
a0 + a1/10 + a2/102 + ...

I think now I need to show that this number can be changed into base b which I am not quite sure how to do. And even once I have done that, I am not sure that I am any closer to solving the problem.

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks

-Dif
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The above proof for 10 carries over to base b with the following changes.
1) range of a's is (0,b-1).
2) denominators are powers of b rather than powers of 10.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top