MHB Really simple, system in equilibrium (weight and tension in light string)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a small smooth ring of mass 0.1 kg hanging in equilibrium on a light string, with one part inclined at 40° to the horizontal. It is established that the other part of the string, RB, must also be inclined at 40° to maintain equilibrium, as differing angles would result in unequal horizontal force components. The tension in the string is consistent throughout, leading to the equation Tcos(40) = Tcos(θ), which confirms θ = 40°. Additionally, the vertical forces must balance the weight of the ring, allowing for the calculation of tension using the equation 2Tsin(40) = mg. The analysis concludes that both parts of the string are inclined at 40° and provides a method to find the tension.
furor celtica
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
A small smooth ring R of mass 0.1 kg is threaded on a light string. The ends of the string are fastened to two fixed points A and B. The ring hangs in equilibrium with the part AR of the string inclined at 40° to the horizontal, as shown in the diagram. Show that the part RB of the string is also inclined at 40° to the horizontal and find the tension in the string.

I have no difficulties with the second question, namely finding the tension in the string, but although it seems obvious to me that RB should be inclined at 40° to the horizontal, I’m at a loss to prove why in the most coherent way possible. I would be grateful for an outline on how to prove this concisely and effectively. Cheers
 

Attachments

  • diagram.png
    diagram.png
    1.4 KB · Views: 117
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The tension in the string (or more precisely the magnitude $T$ of the tensional force) has to be the same all the way along the string. So the forces on the ring are as follows:
a force of magnitude $T$ in the direction RA,
a force of magnitude $T$ in the direction RB,
the weight of the ring, in a vertical direction.
Now resolve those forces horizontally.
 
furorceltica said:
A small smooth ring R of mass 0.1 kg is threaded on a light string. The ends of the string are fastened to two fixed points A and B. The ring hangs in equilibrium with the part AR of the string inclined at 40° to the horizontal, as shown in the diagram. Show that the part RB of the string is also inclined at 40° to the horizontal and find the tension in the string.

I have no difficulties with the second question, namely finding the tension in the string, but although it seems obvious to me that RB should be inclined at 40° to the horizontal, I’m at a loss to prove why in the most coherent way possible. I would be grateful for an outline on how to prove this concisely and effectively. Cheers

If rhe two parts of the string were at different angles their horizontal components would not be equql qnd we would not have equlibrium.
 
Specifically, the horizontal component of the force on the left is Tcos(40) (T is the tension in the cable) to the left. The horizontal component of the force on the right is Tcos(\theta) to the right. Since the object does not move left or right those two components must be the same: Tcos(40)= Tcos(\theta). Dividing both sides by T, cos(40)= cos(\theta) and since \theta is clearly les than 90 degrees, \theta= 40.

Now the vertical component of force on the left is Tsin(40) upwad and the vertical component of force on the right is Tsin(\theta), also upward. Since the object does not move up or down, those two must add to the weight, mg, which is g here.
Because \theta= 40[/itex], sin(\theta)+ Tsin(40)= 2Tsin(40)= -g and you can solve that for T.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top