MHB Why Does Changing Order of Rate Adjustments Affect the Final Outcome?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kdan78
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Changing the order of rate adjustments affects the final outcome due to the use of different bases for each calculation. This concept is illustrated by the example of calculating 100 less 10% and then increasing the result by 10%, which does not return to the original number. The sequence of adjustments influences their impact, as later adjustments can have different effects compared to earlier ones. The discussion emphasizes that the calculations are not linear and depend on the order in which they are applied. Understanding this principle is crucial for accurate financial assessments.
kdan78
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am having a tough time figuring out why the change in the rates in this problem is not equal to the sum of the pieces, any assistance would be appreciated:

View attachment 7727
 

Attachments

  • math problem.PNG
    math problem.PNG
    3.8 KB · Views: 85
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Different Bases for each individual calculation.

It doesn't work for the same reason that the old trick question doesn't get you back where you started...

What is 100 less 10% and then the result is increased by 10%? Please respond to this question.
 
tkhunny said:
Different Bases for each individual calculation.

It doesn't work for the same reason that the old trick question doesn't get you back where you started...

What is 100 less 10% and then the result is increased by 10%? Please respond to this question.

Agree, but then the order of the adjustments would dictate the impact. Meaning the 4th adjustments will have one bases point impact as the last adjustment but a different impact as the first adjustment.

- - - Updated - - -

tkhunny said:
Different Bases for each individual calculation.

It doesn't work for the same reason that the old trick question doesn't get you back where you started...

What is 100 less 10% and then the result is increased by 10%? Please respond to this question.

99,
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top