Reconsidering the Name of Physics Forums: A Multifaceted Discussion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raghav Gupta
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the name "Physics Forums" and whether it should reflect the forum's broader range of topics, including math, chemistry, and computing. Participants note that the forum's name originated from its initial focus on physics, which has since expanded. There is a strong sentiment that changing the name could undermine brand recognition built over 14 years. Members appreciate the forum's responsiveness and the quality of answers provided by mentors. The historical context of the forum's evolution is acknowledged, with some questioning the initial focus and the decision to expand topics over time.
Raghav Gupta
Messages
1,010
Reaction score
76
I have a doubt that why the name of this forum is Physics Forums?
It has so many facilities and vast subjects like ( Maths, Physics, Chemistry, Computing, General discussion etc. )
Why not have a name like Multi-functional forums or other?
I think that PF evolved by starting with physics topic initially
But now it has so variety.
Sorry for any offense but just suggesting.
One may give a appropriate reply.
 
  • Like
Likes Lizabella
Physics news on Phys.org
Because physics is the best!

I also can't picture someone performing a Google search for Multi-functional forums.
 
That lies on one perception.
To me it looks like Maths is the best followed by physics and then chemistry( considering these 3 subjects).
 
Once you build a brand over 14 years, you don't change it :)
 
  • Like
Likes PWiz, Nugatory and dlgoff
Name recognition.
 
  • Like
Likes Raghav Gupta
The discussion could be, "should Greg have chosen a different name?" :)
 
"Greg's Pub." Come on in and play darts.
 
  • Like
Likes adjacent, Enigman and Greg Bernhardt
Greg Bernhardt said:
The discussion could be, "should Greg have chosen a different name?" :)
Not have thought of addressing you directly. But guess it might have been a catchy topic.:cool:
Only one question had to ask as I am only a month old member, did PF initially had only physics topic discussed? Did other topics came later?
 
  • #10
Greg Bernhardt said:
Have a look
"Blast from the past." Thought you'd lost all that.
 
  • #11
One of the reasons I named it Physics Forums lies in the purpose of creating it in the first place. PF started as an extra credit project because I was failing high school physics.
 
  • #12
Looked at some history of PF by the link provided.
See Maths,Physics, Cosmology etc but not chemistry in March 2001.
Greg Bernhardt said:
One of the reasons I named it Physics Forums lies in the purpose of creating it in the first place. PF started as an extra credit project because I was failing high school physics.
So why then other topics besides physics
 
  • #13
Raghav Gupta said:
So why then other topics besides physics
Simply, I was interested in more than just physics, but the name helped with the relevance factor.
 
  • Like
Likes Raghav Gupta
  • #14
Yeah that explains everything to me.
As it is also a feedback forum
I really like PF!
Because most of the time my questions are answered by the mentors, admin etc. in a small time interval and I am really satisfied most of the times.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
  • #16
Greg Bernhardt said:
Once you build a brand over 14 years, you don't change it :)
I have noticed it recently that how are you a member since March 2003 if it has been 14 years of foundation of PF?
 
  • #17
Raghav Gupta said:
I have noticed it recently that how are you a member since March 2003 if it has been 14 years of foundation of PF?

I'd guess that the data from the first 2 years wasn't kept. The archive link earlier in the thread shows posts from 2001.
 
  • #18
Raghav Gupta said:
I have noticed it recently that how are you a member since March 2003 if it has been 14 years of foundation of PF?
The first two years were tumultuous and on amateurish software. We decided a wipe was necessary. I still have a backup of those two years and not too long ago had them up to view.
 
  • #19
Okay.Thanks for solving the query.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top