Rectangular and Polar Coordinates with variables

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around converting equations from rectangular to polar coordinates, specifically focusing on the equations x² + y² = x and y² = 2x. Participants are exploring the relationships between the two coordinate systems and the relevant transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the polar coordinate transformations but expresses confusion about finding the angle θ. They also explore the reverse process of converting polar to rectangular coordinates.
  • Some participants suggest using the coordinate transformations directly without needing to determine θ.
  • Others question whether their manipulations and derived expressions for r are correct, particularly in relation to the second equation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing their attempts and questioning the validity of their approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the transformations, and there appears to be a collaborative effort to clarify the steps involved in the conversion process.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the original poster's long absence from studying the material, which may contribute to their uncertainty. Additionally, participants reflect on the challenges of problem-solving and the variability of their experiences with different types of mathematical problems.

APolaris
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to help a friend with these two questions, but given that I haven't studied this material in over a decade, it's one of the topics I cannot recall at all.

Convert the following from rectangular to polar coordinates:

(a) x2 + y2 = x

(b) y2 = 2x

Homework Equations



r2 = x2 + y2

Tan(T) = y/x, where (T) stands in for theta

The Attempt at a Solution



For the first one, I found r = x1/2, aka sqrt (x), but am completely stumped on what to do about finding theta. Arctan (sqrt(x - x2) / (x2 + y2))... yeah, I'm pretty sure that whole tangent thing is useless. Using the reverse procedure (polar to rectangular) gives [sqrt(x) cos (T)]2 + [sqrt(x) sin(T)]2 = sqrt(x) cos(T). Then x cos2(T) + x sin2(T) = sqrt(x) cos(T). Factoring out an x, the cos2 + sin2 identity just gives x = sqrt(x) cos(T), which is... I'm pretty sure it's what was already known.

For the second: No idea how the two relevant equations could even potentially be useful, but I did notice if you take the reverse procedure (going from polar to rectangular), then using x = r cos(T), y = r sin(T), then [r sin(T)]2 = 2 r cos(T). This eventually reduces to r = 2 cos(T) / sin2(T), or r = 2 cot(T)csc(T), or any number of other expressions that leaves me none the wiser about what the polar coordinates are supposed to resemble.

I suppose if you substitute y = sqrt(2x), that gives r = sqrt(x2 + 2x). Again, no idea how this is supposed to be useful.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just use the coordinate transformations you stated above.

x=rcosθ
y=rsinθ

you don't need to find the actual value of θ
 
rock.freak667 said:
Just use the coordinate transformations you stated above.

x=rcosθ
y=rsinθ

you don't need to find the actual value of θ

I thought that was for converting polar coordinates to rectangular.

Anyway, does that mean my solution for the second one is complete, and that the answer should just be r = 2 cos(θ)/sin2(θ)?

For the second one, I tried redoing the manipulation without substituting sqrt(x) for r. Should the following be correct?

r2 cos2θ + r2 sin2θ = r cos θ

r2 = r cos θ

r = cos θ
 
Yes those should be correct.
 
Thank you very much. I'm certain my friend will appreciate this in the morning.

Funny how problems can be easier than they seem like this. The other day, I solved half of a Putnam question, then later failed to manage a basic geometry proof involving a circle. It's like sidestepping a pile of horse dung and falling down a manhole cover. There should really be an adjective describing people like me.
 
APolaris said:
Thank you very much. I'm certain my friend will appreciate this in the morning.

Funny how problems can be easier than they seem like this. The other day, I solved half of a Putnam question, then later failed to manage a basic geometry proof involving a circle. It's like sidestepping a pile of horse dung and falling down a manhole cover. There should really be an adjective describing people like me.

I think they are called over-thinkers :-p
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K