Rectangular Waveguide With Dipole in it

AI Thread Summary
A dipole antenna can effectively inject or receive signals in a rectangular waveguide, despite the waveguide not supporting TEM waves. When excited, the dipole will radiate energy into the waveguide, exciting both propagating and evanescent modes. The placement of the antenna is crucial for exciting specific modes, such as the TE10 mode, which requires positioning it at the peak of the electric field. Understanding the relationship between frequency and mode propagation is essential, as different frequencies can lead to the excitation of multiple modes. The discussion highlights the complexities of antenna placement and mode interaction within waveguides.
fred3142
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I know that to receive or inject a signal into a rectangular waveguide (I'll just call it a waveguide from now on with the assumption that I mean rectangular waveguide), you can get a dipole of some sort, and poke it into the waveguide.

What I'm wondering about is, if I got a dipole antenna (for example, I I stood an old-school mobile phone up in waveguide) and put it in the waveguide and excited it, what would happen?

As far as I know, the dipole produces TEM waves; however, the waveguide doesn't support TEM, so what will it do? I'm pretty sure it's got to transmit somehow, so does it somehow convert it into TE?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correctt that it will in general radiate energy into the waveguide. This is in fact one practical way to get energy into and out of a waveguide. The details of what happens is messy and depends upon excatly where you place the antenna, the size of the antenna, etc.

In general, the antenna will excite a number of the propagating waveguide modes, as well as a number of evanescent (non-propagating) modes that are localized near the antenna and store electromagnetic energy. The propagating modes determine the radiation resistance (real part of antenna input impedance), while the evanescent modes determine the radiation reactance (imaginary part of the input impedance).

You can use your intuition to get a good first guess as to where the antenna should be in order to excite, say, the TE10 mode of a rectangular waveguide. You can start by using a frequency for which only the TE10 mode propagates. Then, placing the antenna where the peak of the electric field should be (in the middle!) gets you the right location in one dimension. The other dimension (how close to one of the two "ends" of the waveguide) can dramatically impact the input impedance.

Jason
 
Thanks for the clarification. I'm not sure I entirely understand, from what I understand, you're saying that in order to excite the TE10 mode, one must place the antenna in a particular location in the guide; does this mean that then only the TE10 mode will be excited (because in order to excite the other modes, one'd need to place the antenna somewhere else)?

I'm actually trying to understand this question which was asked in a previous exam (in 2009). I calculated the TE10 cutoff to be about 600MHz and the TE01 to be about 850MHz. My idea is that in all the cases (i), (ii) and (iii), the signal will reach the end of the waveguide; however, depending on the frequency, it'll split over multiple modes (so for (i), it'll travel to the end of the guide in both the TE10 and the TE01 modes). I have no answer to this question, and am just trying to understand this better.

Thanks for your help.
 

Attachments

  • 2009ExamQuestion.png
    2009ExamQuestion.png
    13.8 KB · Views: 571
Fred3142,

This is a coursework style question so this isn't the appropriate forum. Please read the pinned thread in this "Classical Physics" forum:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=89899
In any case, this is a question about cutoff and the polarization of the different modes. You should be able to take it from there. Hint: think physically.

If you have more questions please post in the "homework and coursework" forum. Thanks,

jason
 
Ah okay, sorry I did not realize. Thank you nonetheless!
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Back
Top