1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Redesigning the math/physics curriculum, take 2

  1. Aug 28, 2016 #1
    I saw the topic and have given it a lot of thought over the past few years, and my take is so different from the other thread I'm starting another.

    Problems with the beginning math curriculum:
    1. Too abstract and difficult
    2. Totally unmotivated

    These problems were unavoidable 50 years ago, but now computers have changed everything. They have totally changed how math is used in the real world, but this hasn't been reflected in the educational system.

    Why is math so difficult? The quick answer is that physical laws are typically written as differential equations, so differential equations are the starting point of mathematical physics, and most differential equations are unsolvable. E.g. Newton's first differential equation, for the trajectory of a falling apple, p''(t) = C/p(t)*p(t), is unsolvable.

    The result has been that the math curriculum (in my experience) avoids differential equations for as long as possible. And when you finally take a course in DEs it is a hodge podge of methods you will likely never use of even think of again. At least I didn't in 20 yrs. as an engineer.

    What has happened is that computers have totally changed how differential equations are analyzed in the real world, where numerical methods are used extensively. The simplest numerical method for computing solutions to ordinary differential equations is Euler's method which boils down to the equation distance equals velocity times time, and can be taught to juniors in high school in a day, no previous calculus experience required.

    Computational calculus, unlike analytic calculus, is easy to learn, and it immediately opens up the world of physics where all sort of interesting and challenging problems can be presented.

    In fact, I have a series of video lessons that do just that, go to YouTube and search for wdflannery and you'll find two playlists, let's see if I can remember the topics .... nope .. gotta look ...

    1 - Computational calculus basics, MATLAB, Newton's model, Orbits, More orbits, Apollo, Juno, Accuracy of Euler's Method, Electrical circuit basics, Capacitors, Inductors, Oscillators, Filters, SPICE, Rigid Body Dynamics, A bouncing spinning ball, A smooth ride over a bumpy surface, An airplane simulator, Rocket launch to orbit, VEX robot sim

    The second series uses the finite difference method, that is Euler's method applied to partial differential equations, to analyze ...

    2 - Heat transfer 1, 2, 3, 4, An epic battle between a sine wave and a square wave, Analysis of a square drum, Tensors in twenty .... minutes, Stress and strain, the party's over, The stress tensor, The strain tensor, Stress and strain case studies 1 and 2, The Navier-Stokes Equations, The stress and strain rate tensors, A Poisson equation for pressure, Cavity flow, flow over a backward step, Maxwell's equations in integral form, Maxwell's equations in differential form, Computational electrodynamics in 1-D, Computational electrodynamics in 2-D, The Yee/FDTD algorithm

    It's a hell of a list, but I actually went thru most of this material in a 1-yr informal course with two very bright high school students. The projects are really very simple up to the last three topics, starting with tensors and stress and strain in materials, but even here the calculus is still the FDM, but the derivations of the model equations are more involved. (By the way, I claim and I hope demonstrate that tensors are straightforward once you decide to bypass the specialized notation (up and down indices, pre and post multiplication, suppressed summations) and use conventional notation.
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2016
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 2, 2016 #2
    Thanks for the thread! This is an automated courtesy bump. Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post? The more details the better.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Redesigning the math/physics curriculum, take 2
Loading...