Reducing a System of Equations to One Variable

st3dent
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am difficulty solving this system of equations.

Eqn1: 1.0416*10-21 = 4.75*10-27(x2) + 1.68*10-27(x1)(cos a)

Eqn2: 2.827 = (x1)(sin a)

Eqn3: 3.22896*10-16 = 8.4*10-28(x2)2 + 3.36*10-27(x1)2

I keep on getting equations with two variables in it. Can someone tell me how to get an eqn with only one variable out of this system.. Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
st3dent said:
Hello, I am difficulty solving this system of equations.

Eqn1: 1.0416*10-21 = 4.75*10-27(x2) + 1.68*10-27(x1)(cos a)

Eqn2: 2.827 = (x1)(sin a)

Eqn3: 3.22896*10-16 = 8.4*10-28(x2)2 + 3.36*10-27(x1)2

I keep on getting equations with two variables in it. Can someone tell me how to get an eqn with only one variable out of this system.. Thanks!

Eq 3 let's you define x_2 in terms of x_1 as a simple ratio. Eq 2 let's you define a in terms ofx_1 using an arcsin. Substituting these into Eq 1 will give you an equation with only one variable, although it will contain the cos of an arcsin.

Does that help?
 
st3dent,

The cos(arcsin( )) in the solution that Bob3141592 showed you how to get can be simplified.
 
Eq 2 gives you 'x_1 = 2.827/sin(a)'. Substitute this for x_1 in Eq 1 and 3, then in each solve for x_2 and equate. Can then calc 'a' and work back.
 
solve the first equation for x_1 cos(a), square, then add to the second equation squared. Substitute into the third equation for x_1^2, you only have one unknown then...backsubstitute...
 
Thank you.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top