Reducing Order: Is it Valid to Say G(x) = 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bishy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reduction
bishy
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm making an assumption while trying to solve DEs by reduction of order. I've got a short form equation that I can use to reduce it if and only if I can place the DE into standard form. The standard form with generic notation would be y"+ P(x)y' +G(x)y = 0 where P(x) and G(x) are continuous and on the interval I. I am not sure if I am able to say the following, therefore my question would be is this valid:

Given the DE y" - xy' = 0; y=e^x; I= (0,infinity] is it valid to state that the DE is under standard form where G(x) = 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, of course it is! I am wondering what you mean by "y= e^x" immediately after the differential equation. That is clearly not a solution to the equation.
 
ah ok. that's what I thought, I just wasn't sure. As for it not being a solution, I made it up and never bothered checking it. It's not a big a deal, most of the work I have done is confirmed with this.
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...
Back
Top