Inflection Point Calculation: Reduction of Cubic with Second Derivative Method

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of inflection points using the second derivative method for cubic functions. The second derivative is defined as Y'' = 6X + 2A, which equals zero at X = -A/3, indicating the inflection point. The analysis reveals that substituting X = x - A/3 translates the graph, positioning the inflection point at x = 0. The final form of the cubic function is Y = x^3 + bx + c, confirming that the coefficient 'a' must be zero to maintain the correct inflection point behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically second derivatives
  • Familiarity with cubic functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of graph transformations and translations
  • Basic algebra for manipulating polynomial equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of cubic functions and their inflection points
  • Learn about graph transformations, specifically translations and reflections
  • Explore the implications of the second derivative test in calculus
  • Investigate the geometric interpretations of polynomial functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of inflection points in cubic functions and their graphical implications.

Hill
Messages
743
Reaction score
585
Homework Statement
The roots of a general cubic equation in X may be viewed (in the XY-plane) as the intersections of the X-axis with the graph of a cubic of the form, Y = X^3 + AX^2 + BX + C.
(i) Show that the point of inflection of the graph occurs at X = −A/3.
(ii) Deduce (geometrically) that the substitution X = x − A/3 will reduce the above equation to the form Y = x^3 + bx + c.
(iii) Verify this by calculation.
Relevant Equations
Y = X^3 + AX^2 + BX + C
Y = x^3 + bx + c
(i) I take the second derivative of Y: Y'' = 6X + 2A. Y'' = 0 when X = -A/3. Moreover, as Y'' is linear it changes sign at this X. Thus, it is the point of inflection.

(iii) After the substitution, the term x^2 appears twice: one, from X^3 as -3(x^2)(A/3), and another from AX^2 as Ax^2. They cancel. Thus, there is no x^2 term.

(ii) Here I am not sure. The only "geometrical" reasoning I can think of is as follows. The substitution, X = x - A/3 translates the graph of Y in such a way that the inflection point is now at x=0. If the new graph is Y = x^3 + ax^2 + bx +c, its inflection point is at x = -a/3. Thus, a = 0 and Y = x^3 + bx + c.
Is there any other "geometrical deduction"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hill said:
If the new graph is Y = x^3 + ax^2 + bx +c, its inflection point is at x = -a/3. Thus, a = 0 and Y = x^3 + bx + c.
Y'=3x^2+2ax+b
Y^"=6x+2a
Its reflection point is at x=0 there Y"(0)=0.so a=0
The graph is convex upward/downward bordered by inflection point x=0. x^3 and x follow this, but x^2 violates it.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K