Reexamining Time Dilation: A Perspective from Both Frames of Reference

  • Thread starter armaan
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Important
In summary, the person on the airplane would feel time passing more slowly than the person on the ground.
  • #1
armaan
2
0
Hey guys,

I have no background in physics but have been interested in time dilation for a while and have understood the concept without getting technical...

My question is this... this is the atomic clock experiment...


Suppose there are only 2 living beings in the universe ... one stands still on Earth with an atomic clock in his hand... the other goes in an aeroplane at a high uniform speed also with an atomic clock in his hand..

After 60 minutes(on the person standing on Earth's clock) the plane returns and they compare their clocks..

only 59.99999 or wtvr minutes have passed on the person in the planes clock right?

Now here comes my question... Why do we look at this from the person standing on Earth's frame of reference... according to the person on the plane, the person standing on Earth was moving away from HIM at a high uniform speed... so why is the person standing on Earth's clock not slower when they compare... this is my basic confusion...

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The airplane must turn around in order to return to its starting point so the two persons can compare their clocks. The person on the airplane "feels" the turnaround. The person on the ground does not.

To put it another way, the person on the ground remains at rest in a single inertial reference frame. The person on the airplane does not. His reference frame is non-inertial during the turnaround.
 
  • #3
Hey jtbell,

Thanks for your reply. I appreciate your perspective on the solution and it certainly is a very good argument but i don't somehow feel satisfied.

Plus even if the person never returns would his time not be dilated even though neither of them could never compare. What if they send each other radio messages telling the times on their clocks... do you see what I am getting at.. There doesn't have to be a turnaround..

You will then tell me that he feels the forces of acceleration while the person on the grounnd does not...

Well my argument is that in this situation, only a human being would perceive this as motion.. This is becuase we have built planes and felt acceleration before... Some being that has never felt accelration before would not term himself as moving, rather would say that the Earth and the person on Earth are accelrating away. It seems to me to be irrelevant who created the machine, or that there is a machine at all.

What if the 2 people were placed 2 planets moving away from each other. What of time dilation then?
 

Related to Reexamining Time Dilation: A Perspective from Both Frames of Reference

1. Why is a 3rd party important in scientific research?

A 3rd party is important in scientific research because it provides an unbiased perspective. This means that the results and conclusions drawn from the research are less likely to be influenced by personal biases or conflicts of interest.

2. How does a 3rd party ensure objectivity in scientific research?

By being independent from the researchers and their affiliations, a 3rd party can objectively analyze the data and results without any preconceived notions or external pressures. This helps to maintain the integrity of the research.

3. Can a 3rd party add value to scientific research?

Yes, a 3rd party can add value to scientific research by providing a fresh perspective and offering suggestions for improvement. They can also provide expertise in areas that the researchers may not be familiar with, which can enhance the quality of the research.

4. In what situations is a 3rd party necessary in scientific research?

A 3rd party is necessary in scientific research when there is a potential for bias or conflict of interest, such as in research funded by a particular company or when the researchers have a personal stake in the outcome. It is also important in high-stakes research that may have significant implications for society.

5. Are there any downsides to involving a 3rd party in scientific research?

While involving a 3rd party in scientific research can bring many benefits, it can also be time-consuming and add additional costs to the research process. It is important to carefully consider the potential benefits and drawbacks before involving a 3rd party in scientific research.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
282
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
918
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
58
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
115
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
987
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top