MHB Reflecting Ray from Concave Mirror: Parabola Focus

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the reflection of a ray of light striking a concave mirror defined by the parabola \( y^2 = 4ax \). The point of incidence on the mirror is calculated as \( \left(\frac{b^2}{4a}, b\right) \). Using the law of reflection, the slope of the reflected ray is derived, leading to the equation \( y - b = \frac{4ab}{b^2 - 4a^2} \left( x - \frac{b^2}{4a} \right) \). It is shown that this reflected ray passes through the focus of the parabola, located at \( (a, 0) \). The analysis confirms that the focus's position is independent of the initial height \( b \).
sbhatnagar
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
A ray of light is coming along the line $y=b$,($b>0$), from the positive direction of the x-axis and strikes a concave mirror whose intersection with the $x-y$ plane is the parabola $y^2 = 4ax$,($a>0$). Find the equation of the reflected ray and show that it passes through the focus of the parabola.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The point on the mirror where the ray strikes it is:

$\displaystyle \left(\frac{b^2}{4a},b \right)$

The law of reflection states that the angle of incidence is equal to the angle of reflection.

Let $\displaystyle x_r=my+k$ represent the path of the reflected ray. We need to show that $\displaystyle (k,0)$ is the focus of the parabola, and is in fact independent of $\displaystyle b$.

The law of reflection gives us:

$\displaystyle \frac{\pi}{2}-\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{dx}{dy} \right)=\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{dx}{dy} \right)+\pi-\tan^{-1}(m)$

Simplifying and using $\displaystyle \frac{dx}{dy}=\frac{y}{2a}$ we have:

$\displaystyle \tan^{-1}(m)-\frac{\pi}{2}=2\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{y}{2a} \right)$

Taking the tangent of both sides, using a co-function identity on the left and a double-angle identity on the right, we have:

$\displaystyle -\frac{1}{m}=\frac{\frac{y}{a}}{1-\left(\frac{y}{2a} \right)^2}$

$\displaystyle m=\frac{\left(\frac{y}{2a} \right)^2-1}{\frac{y}{a}}=\frac{y^2-4a^2}{4ay}$

We may now state, using the point $\displaystyle \left(\frac{b^2}{4a},b \right)$:

$\displaystyle k=\frac{b^2}{4a}-\left(\frac{b^2-4a^2}{4ab} \right)b=\frac{b^2-b^2+4a^2}{4a}=a$

We know the focus of the given parable is at $\displaystyle (a,0)$, thus we have shown the reflected ray will pass through the focus.
 
Here are my ideas. Let $P$ be the point of incidence. $P$ is the intersection of the line $y=b$ and the parabola $y^2=4ax$.

View attachment 490

The point $P$ will be $\left( \frac{b^2}{4a},b\right)$.
The equation of tangent $PT$ at $P$ is

$y \cdot b=2a\left( x+\frac{b^2}{4a}\right)$

The slope of this line is $\displaystyle \tan(\theta)=\frac{2a}{b}$(see the diagram)

Let the slope of the reflected ray be $m$.

$$ \begin{aligned} \therefore \ \tan \theta &= \Bigg| \frac{m-\frac{2a}{b}}{1+m\frac{2a}{b}}\Bigg| \\ \frac{2a}{b} &=\Bigg| \frac{m-\frac{2a}{b}}{1+m\frac{2a}{b}}\Bigg|\end{aligned} $$

From here, $\displaystyle m= \frac{4ab}{b^2-4a^2}$

Therefore, the equation of the reflected ray is

$\displaystyle y-b=\frac{4ab}{b^2-4a^2} \left( x-\frac{b^2}{4a}\right)$

This line satisfies the point $(a,0)$, therefore the reflected ray passes through the focus.
 

Attachments

  • parabola- figure.png
    parabola- figure.png
    2 KB · Views: 105
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top