Reflection and Transmission (Waves in strings)

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves two copper wires of different diameters and lengths, connected end-to-end, with a block suspended to create tension. The key equations relate wave speed, tension, and linear mass density, with calculations yielding linear mass densities of 7.0e-3 kg/m for the first wire and 2.8e-2 kg/m for the second. The challenge lies in connecting the pulse travel time of 50 ms and the total wire length of 3 m to determine the wave speed. Once the wave speed is established, Newton's laws can be applied to find the mass of the block. The discussion suggests exploring the use of sine functions to further analyze wave properties.
trusean
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two copper wires, one 1.0 mm in diameter and 1.0 m long, the other 2.0 mm in diameter
and 2.0 m long, are joined together end-to-end and hung vertically. In order to tension
this compound wire, a block is suspended from it. It is found that a transverse pulse takes
50 ms to travel the length of the joined wires. What is the mass of the block? The density
of copper is 8920 kg/m3. (Hint: Given the volume mass density and diameters of the
wires, how can we find their linear mass densities?)

Homework Equations



v=square root (T/Mu)
Sum of All Forces=0
V=Pir^2h
d=m/V
Where:
v=wave speed
T=Tension of string/wire
Mu=mass/length of string in units kg/m
V=volume of cylinder
d=density

The Attempt at a Solution



We started by finding Mu with the above equations to be 7.0e-3 kg/m for wire one and 2.8e-2 kg/m for wire two, respectably. What we do not understand is the relationship between the pulse time (50 milli-seconds), length of wire (3m) and the wavespeed. We think that after finding the wavespeed of the pulse we can use Newtons law to find the mass attached to the tensile forces. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps using the a sine function and v(wavespeed)=lambda/T(period) we could determine the wavespeed by inputing Pi/2 for T and 50ms for lambda?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top