Refraction at a spherical surface

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
stpmmaths
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



attachment.php?attachmentid=20107&stc=1&d=1250245914.jpg


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I was kind of confuse with the use of refractive index.

For the first part of question, n1 = 1.00 and n2 = 1.50. From what I know, the object is at vacuum so the n1 = 1.00.

But why for the second part of the question, n1 = 1.50 and n2 = 1.00 ? After the first refracting surface, the image should be at the vacuum too. But why we use n1 = 1.50?
 

Attachments

  • IMG.jpg
    IMG.jpg
    45 KB · Views: 914
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi stpmmaths! Welcome to PF! :smile:
stpmmaths said:
I was kind of confuse with the use of refractive index.

For the first part of question, n1 = 1.00 and n2 = 1.50. From what I know, the object is at vacuum so the n1 = 1.00.

But why for the second part of the question, n1 = 1.50 and n2 = 1.00 ? After the first refracting surface, the image should be at the vacuum too. But why we use n1 = 1.50?

(I can't see your attachment yet, but …)

I assume that the light starts by going into the sphere from the air (or vacuum), so it's going from n = 1 to n = 1.5;

then it travels through the sphere (n = 1.5) until it hits the opposite surface and comes out again, so it's going from n = 1.5 to n = 1. :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi stpmmaths! Welcome to PF! :smile:(I can't see your attachment yet, but …)

I assume that the light starts by going into the sphere from the air (or vacuum), so it's going from n = 1 to n = 1.5;

then it travels through the sphere (n = 1.5) until it hits the opposite surface and comes out again, so it's going from n = 1.5 to n = 1. :wink:

Ok..I understand a bit.

Now I came across with another question similar to this question(quite similar)

Quenstion:
attachment.php?attachmentid=20113&stc=1&d=1250304700.jpg

Answer:
attachment.php?attachmentid=20114&stc=1&d=1250304700.jpg


Why the n1 is 1.50 if we say the light starts from vacuum?:confused:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0001.jpg
    IMG_0001.jpg
    30.5 KB · Views: 474
  • IMG_0002.jpg
    IMG_0002.jpg
    33.1 KB · Views: 604
Oo, I got it.
Thanks everyone.