Reimann sums, okay. How about a Reimann product ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pellman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product Sums
pellman
Messages
683
Reaction score
6
Reimann sums, okay. How about a "Reimann product"?

An integral is a sort of "continuous sum". Very roughly, the sum Σk f(xk) Δx goes over to the integral ∫f(x)dx when the number of terms becomes infinite while Δx goes to zero.

What about a similar "continuous product"? If we have the product

Πk [f(xk)] Pk

and let the exponents Pk go to zero while the number of products goes to infinite (and the range of xk is fixed as in an integral) what sort of an animal do we get?

I realize that we can turn this product into a sum by taking the anti-logarithm. Then the continuous limit of this product is e raised to an integral with ln(f) in the integrand. However, I'm curious if the properties of these sorts of entities are known without resorting to integrals. And is there a notation for them?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thanks, Ambitwistor.

Having thought it over, I see now that these products have probably not been studied in themselves since they can always be reduced to an integral. Like so, ..

Πk [f(xk)] Pk
= exp[ ln ( Πk [f(xk)] Pk ) ]
= exp[ Σk Pkf(xk) ]
= exp[ Σk α(xk)f(xk) Δx ] , Pk = α(xk)Δx
--> exp[ ∫ α(x) f(x) dx ]


which shows why I said the exponents go to zero.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top