Related Rates: Calculating Change in Distance Between Clock Hands at 9 o'clock

  • Thread starter Thread starter rdougie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Related rates
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the rate of change of the distance between the tips of the hour and minute hands of a clock at 9 o'clock, given the lengths of the hands. The subject area includes related rates and geometric relationships, particularly involving triangles and circular motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the geometric setup, including the use of triangles and circles to model the situation. There are attempts to apply the Law of Cosines and to derive expressions for the positions of the hands. Questions arise regarding the necessity of the chain rule and the correct interpretation of velocity vectors in this context.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various approaches being explored. Some participants are questioning the assumptions made about the angles and the relationships between the hands, while others are providing insights into the mathematical relationships involved. There is no explicit consensus yet, but productive lines of reasoning are being developed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the specific angles at 9 o'clock and the rotational speeds of the hands, which may influence the calculations. There is also mention of the need for clarity regarding the definitions of the vectors involved in the problem.

rdougie
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"On a certain clock the minute had is 4in long, and the hour hand is 3in long. How fast is the distance between the tips of the hands changing at 9 o'clock?"


Homework Equations


- a^{2} + b^{2} = c^{2}
- Law of Cosines?

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok i drew a clock, and the 3-4-5 triangle positioned at 9:00. The distance between the 2 tips is 5in, but how would I find the rate of change between them? If the distance is marked by x, then I'm solving for dx/d\Theta, right? For every 6 degrees the minute hand moves, the hour hand moves one. I'm thoroughly confused...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think of this as two concentric circles with radii R and r (R > r). The inner circle is stationary, but the outer circle is rotating. At t = 0 two points (one on each circle) lie on a straight line through the origin so their distance is d = R - r. At t = \epsilon, the outer circle has rotated some, so the distance between the two points has increased. Find (d(\epsilon) - d(0))/\epsilon as \epsilon --> 0.
 
Welcome to PF!

What I would do is the following. There are two lines of different lengths (r and R) rotating about a common origin at different frequencies. If the tips of the lines are points a and b, I'd write equations that represent the x,y locations of a and b (with respect to t) using initial conditions such that the postions of the lines are at 9:00 at t=0. I'd then write an expression for the distance between points a and b, take the derivative and evaluate it at t=0. Chain rule involved.
 
Last edited:
In general, the angle formed by the hands is not a right angle (it happens to be at 9:00 but not immediately after). Your second thought was correct: you can use the cosine law to write the distance between the tips of the hands as a function of the angle between them.
 
Why is the chain rule needed here? Defining \hat x as the 12:00 position, \hat y as the 3:00 position, and \theta_m as the angle between the 12:00 position and the minute hand measured clockwise, then the tip minute hand is at

\vec m = 5\text{in}(\cos \theta_m \hat x + \sin \theta_m \hat y)

The minute hand makes one revolution per hour. Thus \dot \theta_m = 2\pi/\text{hr}[/tex]. Differentiating the expression for \vec m,<br /> <br /> \frac{d}{dt}\vec m = 10\pi\text{in}/\text{hr}(-\sin \theta_m \hat x + \cos \theta_m \hat y)<br /> <br /> You can treat the hour hand similarly. Taking the difference between these two velocity vectors yields the tip-to-tip velocity. Apply the specific values for \theta_m and \theta_h, take the magnitude, and voila, you have the distance rate of change.<b>The above is not correct.</b> Correction is imminent.
 
Last edited:
I should know better. The magnitude of a velocity vector does not equal to the time derivative of the magnitude underlying displacement vector.

Suppose \vec d is some displacement vector (e.g., the vector from the end of the hour hand to the end of the minute hand). Denote d=||\vec d|| as the magnitude of this displacement vector. For an inner product metric space,

d^2 \equiv \vec d \cdot \vec d[/itex]<br /> <br /> Differentiating with respect to time,<br /> <br /> 2d\dot d = 2\vec d \cdot \dot {\vec d}[/itex]&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Solving for the time derivative of the magnitude of the displacement vector,&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; \dot d = \frac{\vec d \cdot \dot {\vec d}}{d}[/itex]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; The magnitude of the velocity vector, \sqrt{\dot {\vec d} \cdot \dot {\vec d}} is obviously not the same as the time derivative of the magnitude of the displacement vector.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K