Relating derivative to original function

linearfish
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let [a, b] be an interval in R, and f:[a, b] -> R be differentiable on [a, b]. Assume f(a) = 0, and that there is a number M such that
[tex]\left|f'(x)\right| \leq M \left|f(x)\right|[/tex]
for all x in [a, b]. Prove that f is identically 0 on [a, b].

Homework Equations


Mean Value Theorem?


The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried this problem multiple times and I keep hitting a wall. I've tried to approach it through contradiction, letting c be some point in [a, b] such that f(c) > 0, but it always seems that we could find an M sufficiently large such that this is true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I found some hints in Rudin and I think I've almost got it but I can't justify one step:

Fix x0 in [a,b], let M0 = sup|f(x)| and M1 = sup|f'(x)| for a < x < x0. (Should be less than or equal to).

Then for any such x,
[tex]\left|f(x)\right| \leq M_1 (x_0 - a) \leq A (x_0 - a) M_0[/tex]

The middle step I can justify with the MVT and the next one with the given relation between f and its derivative. Now how do I show that M0 must be 0. I believe it has something to do with how we choose x0 (we can choose it to be very small). Thanks.
 
linearfish said:
[tex]\left|f(x)\right| \leq M_1 (x_0 - a) \leq A (x_0 - a) M_0[/tex]
Should that A be an M?

Anyway, suppose for a contradiction that M0>0. We may also assume that M>0 (why?). By definition, we have

[tex]M_0 \leq M (x_0 - a) M_0.[/tex]

What does this tell us?
 
Yes, that should be an M, thank you.

I can see why M > 0. If M < 0 we would have

[tex]0 \leq \left| f'(x) \right| \leq M \left| f(x) \right| \leq 0[/tex]

and we are done.

Now if M0 > 0, then we must have

[tex]M (x_0 - a) \geq 1[/tex]

for all x in (a, x0), but this fails if we choose x to be a + 1/(2M).

[tex]M (a + \frac{1}{2M} - a) = M(\frac{1}{2M}) = \frac{1}{2} \geq 1[/tex].

Is this the idea? Thanks for the help.
 
Yup, that's the idea. (That last [itex]\geq[/itex] should really be a [itex]<[/itex] though!)
 
Right, I meant that as a contradiction. Thanks again for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K