MHB Relation between matrix elements of momentum and position operators

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the relationship between the matrix elements of the momentum operator (p) and the position operator (x) in the context of a Hamiltonian for a single particle. The key equation derived is $$\frac{ \langle i \, | \, p \, | j \rangle}{\langle i \, | \, x \, | j \rangle} = \frac{iM(E_i - E_j)}{\hbar},$$ which connects the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian to the matrix elements of the operators. The calculations involve using canonical commutation relations and the commutator of x with the Hamiltonian to derive necessary expressions. The approach highlights the importance of understanding how to compute matrix elements and the role of energy eigenvalues in these calculations. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the mathematical relationships that can be established through operator algebra in quantum mechanics.
Fantini
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
267
Reaction score
0
Hello. I'm having trouble understanding what is required in the following problem:

Find the relation between the matrix elements of the operators $\widehat{p}$ and $\widehat{x}$ in the base of eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian for one particle, that is, $$\widehat{H} = \frac{1}{2M} \widehat{p}^2 + V(\widehat{x}).$$

I don't understand what kind of relation he is asking for. The eigenvectors for the Hamiltonian satisfy the equation $\widehat{H} \varphi_i = E_i \varphi_i$, but I don't know how to use that. The answer is $$\frac{ \langle i \, | \, p \, | j \rangle}{\langle i \, | \, x \, | j \rangle} = \frac{iM(E_i - E_j)}{\hbar},$$ but it doesn't enlighten me.

How do I find an arbitrary matrix element of an operator?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Just thinking out loud here. First off, we can tidy up the notation so that everything matches: $\hat{H} \, |i\rangle =E_i \, |i\rangle$, and the same for $j$. Let's remember some of the canonical commutation relations, in case they prove useful:
\begin{align*}
[x,p]&=i\hbar \\
[x,x]&=0 \\
[p,p]&=0 \\
[AB,C]&=A[B,C]+[A,C]B.
\end{align*}
The last allows us to compute
\begin{align*}
[x,H]&=\left[x,\frac{p^2}{2M}+V(x)\right] \\
&=\frac{1}{2M} \, [x,p^2]+\underbrace{[x,V(x)]}_{=0} \\
&=-\frac{1}{2M} \, [p^2,x] \\
&=-\frac{1}{2M} \, \left( p[p,x]+[p,x]p \right) \\
&=\frac{i \hbar}{M} \, p.
\end{align*}
The reason I computed this commutator is because the answer has $E_i$ and $E_j$ in it, leading me to think that we're going to have to calculate something with an $H$ in it. If you calculate $[x,H] \, |j\rangle$ two different ways, you get
$$[x,H] \, |j\rangle = \frac{i\hbar}{M} \, p \, |j\rangle = (E_j-H) \, x \, |j\rangle.$$
Here, I have done
\begin{align*}
[x,H] \, |j\rangle&=(xH-Hx) \, |j\rangle \\
&=xH \, |j\rangle - Hx \, |j\rangle \\
&=x E_j \, |j\rangle-Hx \, |j\rangle \\
&=E_j \, x \, |j\rangle -Hx \, |j\rangle \\
&=(E_j-H) \, x \, |j\rangle.
\end{align*}

It seems to me that these computations might help. Does this give you any ideas?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top