# Relation between the two Radii Rf and Ro

• OONeo01
In summary, the orbital angular momentum is conserved during the circularization process. The initial angular momentum is unknown, but it is likely that it is equal to the angular momentum of the original elliptical orbit.
OONeo01

## Homework Statement

A planet orbits a massive star in a highly elliptical orbit, i.e, the total orbital energy is close to Zero. The initial distance of closest approach is 'Ro'. Energy is dissipated through tidal motions until the orbit is circularized with a final radius of 'Rf'. Assume the orbital angular momentum is conserved during the circularization process, Then, what is the relation between Rf and Ro ?

1.) GMm/2Ro
2.) GMm/Rf

## The Attempt at a Solution

I tried subtracting the gravitational energy from the Energy of a circular orbit, to account for the dissipation, and then equated it to zero(since it was originally almost 0). I ended up with 'Rf=2Ro'

But I am not sure about my method. Felt like I have left a lot of loose ends. Also the Angular momentum conservation hint was never used. I believe I have reached the wrong answer(or at best, the right answer the wrong way.) Need help in solving this problem.

If anybody can help me set up the necessary equation(not jut the final answer), I would appreciate it.

Energy is lost, so energy conservation is useless here. Angular momentum, on the other hand, is conserved, so I would use this. What is the initial angular momentum? Which circular orbit has the same angular momentum?

mfb said:
What is the initial angular momentum? Which circular orbit has the same angular momentum?

Ok, So, the general formula for angular momentum would by mvrsinθ;(sin=1 for circular orbits)

Applying it here I get,
mv1Ro*Sinθ=mv2Rf
Implying,
Ro/Rf=v2/v1sinθ

Is that right ? I'll give a heads up, I am a bit of a douche, so you'll have to be a bit patient with me. But I will certainly try my best to come up with the right equations :-) And Thank you for replying..

Right.
Some parts of the equation can be calculated with the known initial conditions, and you can get another equation for the circular motion.

Ok, so I make θ=90° and get Ro/Rf=v2/v1.

Now if I can get v1 or v2 in terms of each other, then I can get my answer.

So I look for another relationship,
I try the force equation, and end up with,
mv12/Ro=GMm/Ro2
which even when simplified doesn't take me much further.

Then I tried the total energy,
-GMm/2Ro≈0
Again this led to nowhere !

This is where I get stuck :-) Am I supposed to write in terms of Kinetic energy so as to include a velocity term ? Even so, everything goes down to 0 because of the RHS X-)

OONeo01 said:
Ok, so I make θ=90° and get Ro/Rf=v2/v1.

Now if I can get v1 or v2 in terms of each other, then I can get my answer.

So I look for another relationship,
I try the force equation, and end up with,
mv12/Ro=GMm/Ro2
which even when simplified doesn't take me much further.

Then I tried the total energy,
-GMm/2Ro≈0
Again this led to nowhere !

This is where I get stuck :-) Am I supposed to write in terms of Kinetic energy so as to include a velocity term ? Even so, everything goes down to 0 because of the RHS X-)
What's the relationship between Kinetic Energy and Potential Energy for a circular orbit?

OONeo01 said:
mv12/Ro=GMm/Ro2
which even when simplified doesn't take me much further.
That would be true for a circular orbit (you can use it to express v2 as function of Rf). For the initial orbit, there is a different relation. Hint: Use the negligible total orbital energy.

-GMm/2Ro≈0
You forgot the kinetic energy at Ro here.

K.E=-(1/2)P.E

K.E.= (1/2)Mv12
P.E.=GMm/Ro

So (since total energy is ≈0),
(1/2)Mv12=GMm/2Ro

Even if I do the same with v2 and Rf, at best I reach Rf=Ro.

But I am unable to understand how to set up equations differently for an Elliptical or bit, and specifically for a circular orbit. All the equations I seem to know are for circular orbits. So I am going wrong somewhere with my calculation of v1 and Ro, isn't it ? X-)

The relation between v1 and R0 is correct.

Going back to Ro/Rf=v2/v1 again, you have Ro as fixed parameter, and you can express v1 and v2 in terms of Ro and Rf, respectively. The constant GMm should cancel if you do this, and you get a relation between Ro and Rf only.

OONeo01 said:
K.E=-(1/2)P.E

K.E.= (1/2)Mv12
P.E.=GMm/Ro

So (since total energy is ≈0),
(1/2)Mv12=GMm/2Ro

Even if I do the same with v2 and Rf, at best I reach Rf=Ro.

But I am unable to understand how to set up equations differently for an Elliptical or bit, and specifically for a circular orbit. All the equations I seem to know are for circular orbits. So I am going wrong somewhere with my calculation of v1 and Ro, isn't it ? X-)
If we take potential energy to be zero at infinity, then potential energy for a circular orbit of radius, Rf is
$\displaystyle \text{P.E.}=-G\frac{mM}{R_f}\ .$​
The kinetic energy for the same orbit is
$\displaystyle \text{K.E.}=\frac{1}{2}m{v_f}^2=G\frac{mM}{2R_f}\ .$​

So the total mechanical energy for a circular orbit of radius, Rf is
$\displaystyle \text{M.E.}= -G\frac{mM}{2R_f}\$​

What is the angular momentum for this circular orbit?

My solution seems to have gone into a circular orbit as well. I started by calculating the angular momentum of a circular orbit, and now I am back to finding the angular momentum of a circular orbit ! X-)

Anyway, how do I write v1 and v2 in terms of Ro and Rf ? I can so far only write v1 in terms of Ro and v2 in terms of Rf, still stalling any possible headway I can make. And even after manipulating algebraically(cancelling the GMm), I can reach Ro=Rf ! Is that the right relation ? :-0 I am not sure it is..

R0=Rf is wrong, you forgot a factor of 2 somewhere (might become a factor of sqrt(2) in the process).

Ok, let me start over again.

So far I have,
1.) R0/Rf=v2/v1
2.) P.E.=-GMm/Rf
3.) K.E=(1/2)mv22=GMm/2Rf
4.) Total Energy=-GMm/2Rf
5.) Angular Momentum(in general)=MvRSinθ (θ=90°for a circle)
6.) v12=Gm/R0
7.) Centripetal force=Mv22/Rf
8.) Gravitational Force(in general)=GMm/R2

So now which equations do I equate to which ones in what order and get my answer ?
Obviously energy with energy; force with force and momentum with momentum.
Equation (1.) comes from Conservation of angular momentum.
I am unable to use Equations (2.), (3.) and (4.) in a productive way on paper like you guys have done it in your head !

With 0 and f as indices everywhere:
(1) ##\frac{R_0}{R_f}=\frac{v_f}{v_0}## (from conserved angular momentum)
(2) ##\frac{1}{2}v_0^2=\frac{GM}{R_0}## (from negligible initial energy, v is the velocity at the radius R0)
(3) ##\frac{1}{2}v_f^2=\frac{GM}{2R_f}## (circular final orbit)

Dividing equation 2 by equation 3 gives ##\frac{v_0^2}{v_f^2}=\frac{2R_f}{R_0}## and this is equivalent to
$$\frac{v_0}{v_f}=\sqrt{\frac{2R_f}{R_0}}$$
Using this in (1) will give you the correct answer.

Now, at the risk of sounding stupid, can you explain to me how you got Equation 2 ? That was my culprit. I wrote equation 2(for R0 and v1) the same as its written in equation 3(for Rf and v2). I don't want to make the same mistakes the next time I form such equations(I prefer making new ones :-D).

Got the final answer though, Rf=2R0.
Thanks a lot mfb and SammyS. Appreciate it :-)

OONeo01 said:
Now, at the risk of sounding stupid, can you explain to me how you got Equation 2 ? ...
It comes from conservation of energy.

The planet comes from very far where it's total orbital energy is close to Zero. Both the K.E. and P.E. being nearly zero.

At closet approach its P.E. is $\displaystyle \ \ -G\frac{mM}{R_0}\,,\$ so it loses how much P.E. ?

That's how much K.E. it gains.

Ok. Thats kind of how I had started and gotten Rf=2R0 even before I had asked this question here. But my concepts were all messed up and so were my equations.

Thanks a lot for your patience :-)

## 1. What is the definition of Radii Rf and Ro?

The radii Rf and Ro refer to the distance from the center of a circle to its outer edge (Rf) and inner edge (Ro), respectively.

## 2. What is the relation between Rf and Ro?

The relation between Rf and Ro is that they are both measurements of the radius of a circle, but Rf is typically larger than Ro since it extends to the outer edge of the circle.

## 3. How are Rf and Ro related to the diameter of a circle?

The diameter of a circle is equal to twice the radius, so the relation between Rf and Ro to the diameter is that Rf is equal to the diameter, while Ro is half the diameter.

## 4. Can Rf be smaller than Ro?

No, Rf cannot be smaller than Ro. The radius of a circle is always measured from the center to the outer edge, so Rf must be larger than Ro.

## 5. How does the relation between Rf and Ro affect the circumference and area of a circle?

The relation between Rf and Ro does not directly affect the circumference and area of a circle. However, since the circumference is dependent on the radius, a change in Rf or Ro will result in a change in the circumference. The same applies to the area of a circle, which is dependent on the square of the radius.

• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
897
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
793
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
975