MHB Relational algebra - What does "in" mean and how is it different than "="?

  • Thread starter Thread starter find_the_fun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Mean
find_the_fun
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
In relational algebra what does "in" mean?
For example
[math]\sigma_{car IN car}R[/math] where R is some relation.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you mean:

$\displaystyle \sigma\in\mathbb{R}$ ?

If so, the "in" means "is an element of."

edit: I just noticed this is probably not what you are referring to! (Doh)
 
I mean the selection operator as described here.
 
find_the_fun said:
In relational algebra what does "in" mean?
For example
[math]\sigma_{car IN car}R[/math] where R is some relation.
The subscript after σ is a formula. The exact syntax of such formulas depends on the context (software, textbook, etc.). As Wikipedia explains, a typical case is when atomic formulas have the form xRy where x is an attribute name, y is an attribute name or a constant, R is a relation such as <, and atomic formulas are joined by logical connectives. The formula "car IN car" is probably an atomic formula. Maybe the first "car" is an attribute name and the second "car" is an array of values. For a more precise answer one needs the context.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top