Relationship of curl and cross product.

Click For Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between the curl operator and the cross product, emphasizing the physical interpretation of the vector product as a pseudovector representing rotation. The curl, denoted as ∇ × A, is defined as the cross product of the del operator with a vector field A. It is highlighted that the magnitude of the cross product corresponds to the area of a parallelogram formed by the vectors involved. The confusion arises in connecting the curl operator's role in determining the direction of vectors in a cross product. Understanding this relationship is crucial for grasping concepts like torque, magnetism, and angular momentum in physics.
10Exahertz
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I am very confused on how to define the vector product or cross product in a physical sense. I know the vector product is a psuedovector, and that it is the area of a parallelogram geometrically. However, I know it used used to describe rotation in physics. As with torque, magnetism and angular momentum. I was wondering how the curl operator plays a role in determining the vectors direction in a cross product or vector product, and why its magnitude is its parallelograms area. I understand the curl operator, but for some reason cannot directly connect it to a cross product to understand it.
much thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In modern notation, the curl of A is written ##\nabla \times \mathbf{A}##.
It is the cross product of the "del" operator ##\nabla## with the vector. The "del" operator is basically shorthand for
##\nabla = \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\hat{e}_x + \frac{\partial}{\partial y}\hat{e}_y + \frac{\partial}{\partial z}\hat{e}_z##

You should verify when you calculate the cross product between "del" (treated like a vector) and A, you get curl A. (Del is actually a vector operator.)
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
25K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K