Can Momentum Save an Astronaut 200m Away from the ISS?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathewsMD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Relative
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem involving an astronaut who has detached from the International Space Station (ISS) and is 200 meters away. The astronaut, weighing 80 kg, throws a 10 kg toolkit away from the ISS at a velocity of 8 m/s to propel herself back. The initial momentum is calculated as zero because both the astronaut and the toolkit are at rest relative to the ISS, which serves as the reference frame. The conversation explores the implications of momentum conservation and the choice of the relative velocity in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of momentum conservation principles
  • Familiarity with reference frames in physics
  • Basic knowledge of kinematics and motion equations
  • Ability to perform calculations involving mass and velocity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of momentum in different reference frames
  • Learn about the conservation of momentum in isolated systems
  • Explore kinematic equations related to motion in space
  • Investigate real-world applications of momentum in space missions
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, aerospace engineers, and anyone interested in the mechanics of motion in space environments.

MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
An 80 kg astronaut has become detached from the safety line connecting her to the International Space Station. She's 200m from the station, at rest relative to it, and has 4 min of air remaining. To get herself back, she tosses a 10 kg tool kit away from the station at 8 m/s. Will she make it back in time?

GGzG83U.png


In the question, the solution uses momentum and calculates it for both the astronaut and tool box since they are at rest only relative to the space station, not the rest frame. Here it shows initial momentum is equal to 0, though. If they are calculating momentum in the rest frame, shouldn't there be an initial momentum of p = (ma + mt)vrel, but it is 0...why? Is not the astronaut and toolbox in motion initially and once again afterwards? Any explanation on why the momentum is paired the way it is would be very helpful! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the rest frame, if it is not a frame of reference where the object/s of interest are at rest?

No other relative position or motion information has been given in this problem, other than " She's 200m from the station, at rest relative to it".

Following from this, the formula you have stated for initial momentum is correct - p = (ma + mt)vrel.
Now what value would you choose for vrel?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
15K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
23K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K