- #1
iLIKEstuff
- 25
- 0
in relating the index of refraction to the relative permittivity (dielectric constant/function). it is known that [tex]n = \sqrt{\epsilon_r}[/tex] for optical frequencies (i.e. [tex]\mu_r=1[/tex].
now this website
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/tables/diel.html#c1
gives the relative permittivity of water as 80.4 i.e. [tex]\epsilon_r = 80.4[/tex]
but we also know that the index of refraction of water is 1.33.
so it should be [tex]n = \sqrt{\epsilon_r} = \sqrt{80.4} = 8.9666[/tex] ? am i missing something here?
i want to use the relative permittivity in an equation to calculate the electrostatic approximation of the scattering/absorption efficiencies of small spherical particles.
should i be solving for relative permittivity from the index of refraction? i.e. [tex]{n}^{2} = {(\sqrt{\epsilon_r})}^{2} \Rightarrow \epsilon_r={1.33}^{2}=1.7689[/tex]
what value should i use for the relative permittivity in this equation?
thanks guys.
now this website
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/tables/diel.html#c1
gives the relative permittivity of water as 80.4 i.e. [tex]\epsilon_r = 80.4[/tex]
but we also know that the index of refraction of water is 1.33.
so it should be [tex]n = \sqrt{\epsilon_r} = \sqrt{80.4} = 8.9666[/tex] ? am i missing something here?
i want to use the relative permittivity in an equation to calculate the electrostatic approximation of the scattering/absorption efficiencies of small spherical particles.
should i be solving for relative permittivity from the index of refraction? i.e. [tex]{n}^{2} = {(\sqrt{\epsilon_r})}^{2} \Rightarrow \epsilon_r={1.33}^{2}=1.7689[/tex]
what value should i use for the relative permittivity in this equation?
thanks guys.