Relative positioning sensor question (With Picture)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design and implementation of a sensor system that allows one camera (A) to detect the position of another camera (B) as it moves within its field of view. Participants explore various sensor technologies, including passive and active detection methods, and consider the implications of environmental factors on detection accuracy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using an infrared sensor to detect camera B, while expressing uncertainty about the best approach.
  • Another participant proposes that camera A could simply "see" camera B if it has a distinct color marker, such as magenta tape, and questions the effectiveness of this method in outdoor conditions.
  • A participant raises concerns about the detection range and resolution of the camera, asking how these factors might affect the ability to detect the colored marker under varying light conditions.
  • It is noted that a passive emitter like a colored patch may be less effective than an active emitter, and the challenges of direction and distance detection are highlighted.
  • One participant suggests using infrared LEDs as an active broadcasting method and questions whether the camera can detect near-infrared light.
  • There is a mention of the Wii system as an example of how recognition software can filter specific wavelengths for detection.
  • A participant expresses interest in finding a diode with a wider beam angle for better detection capabilities.
  • Questions arise about what kind of software could interpret the infrared signals effectively.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the best method for detecting camera B, with no consensus reached on a single approach. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the effectiveness of passive versus active detection methods and the impact of environmental factors.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include uncertainties about the camera specifications, the effectiveness of different detection methods in various lighting conditions, and the requirements for recognition software.

PauloE
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
So I've been researching whatcould be the sensor/s that would do what the picture depicts:
Sensor.png

I have camera A behind camera B. What I'm trying to achieve is: to point the position of camera B when B passes on the field of view of A.

When B pases in front of camera A the Screen of camera A will graphically indicate is position. If you have ever played with Combat Flight Simulator you know what I'm talking about.

I would connect this sensor (as part of a board) and display the readings on the screen the same way an OSD does it.

I've been looking at the way remote controls work and infrared sensor sounds like an option but I would like to hear your thoughts on this.

Just so you know I'm a sophomore Mechanical engineering student so this is not my area of expertise.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm a bit confused about something. Does A need to detect B via some sort of broadcast/receiver arrangement? Why not simply 'see' it?

A can actually see B. If B simply had a piece of magenta (or whatever) tape stuck to it, A would pick it up, and the software could substitute an icon where it detects any magenta.
 
Thanks a lot for your suggestion Dave.

DaveC426913 said:
I'm a bit confused about something. Does A need to detect B via some sort of broadcast/receiver arrangement? Why not simply 'see' it?

That is what I'm thinking but I'm quite ignorant of the different ways I could achieve it.

I was told that to see it could be a good solution to it. My concern is the background (outdoors) and range. How many pixels needs the magenta be to be detected? The camera I'm going to be using it is something like this. How do you think the resolution of the camera could affect the range or detection of the magenta? Does light conditions like a cloudy day or a very sunny day will affect the accurate detection of the magenta? Thanks Dave
 
True, a passive emitter (such as a coloured patch) will be less effective than an active emitter.

But the thing is, you're going to have the same challenges with direction and distance regardless of what you receiving channel you choose. What receiving system will have the resolution to detect direction and distance? A radio receiver won't do that unless you have some sort of image anyway. So, perhaps take advantage of the current hi-rez (optical) imaging system you already have.

But you can switch to an active broadcaster. Use infrared LEDs. Does the camera you have in mind see into the near IR?

It's all going to come down to the recognition software anyway. You should be able to get the software to filter for just IR wavelengths.

This is how the Wii system works.

The Wii has a configuration setting that will show you what its sensor bar sees. The sensor only sensitive to the freq that the controllers emit. So, its image of your living room looks like this. That is an actual, real-time video image of someone's living room. Wave the controllers and those dots will wave too.

65764-208706-calibratejpg-620x.jpg
 
That is very cool Dave.
DaveC426913 said:
Does the camera you have in mind see into the near IR?
It might have a filter like most cameras but I'll check the specs.

I just found this diode but the beam angle is way too narrow. I would need something with a wider beam.
ir sensor .jpg


This is what you mean right?

What kind of software could make sense of the IR signals?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K