Relative velocity and momentum?

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about a logger walking on a floating log, participants debated how to apply conservation of momentum to determine the log's velocity relative to the water. One participant calculated the log's speed as 0.34 m/s, while another found it to be 0.28 m/s, leading to confusion about the correct approach. The key point emphasized was that the center of mass of the system must remain stationary, meaning the log must move in the opposite direction to the logger's movement. Clarification was sought on whether to consider the mass of both the logger and the log or just the log when calculating momentum. Ultimately, the discussion highlighted the importance of understanding the relationship between the logger's speed and the log's counteracting motion to maintain momentum conservation.
buckyball
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Some friends and I were working on some physics questions and when it came to this one, we all got different answers.

An 90 kg logger is standing on a 400 kg log floating at rest in a pond. The logger starts to
walk along the log at 1.5 m/s relative to the water. How fast is the log moving relative to
the water?


Homework Equations


One friend and I used conservation of momentum .

I used: (m1 + m2)(0) = m1(1.2) + m2(v')
She used: (m1+m2)(0) = m1(1.2) + (m1+m2)(v')



The Attempt at a Solution


I got 0.34 m/s and my friend got 0.28 m/s. Are either of us right?

Thank-you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Remember that the center of mass of the system will not move.

What condition then must be met such that this is accomplished? That is how fast must the center of mass of the log move counter to the movement of the logger?
 
Are you saying that the velocity will be 1.5 m/s in the opposite direction of the logger?
 
I've been thinking more about it. The logger and the log is at rest, so the center of mass of the system is zero. Once the logger moves in one direction along the length of the log, he is moving at 1.2 m/s.

I understand that if you use conservation of momentum, that the log must move in the opposite direction as the logger, but that is where my friends and I cannot agree on.

Do we use the mass of the logger and log moving in the opposite direction of the logger since the logger is still on the log? Or do you just use the mass of the log moving the other direction since the logger is moving in the other direction.

Any more clarification would be great! Thank-you.

DG.
 
buckyball said:
I've been thinking more about it. The logger and the log is at rest, so the center of mass of the system is zero. Once the logger moves in one direction along the length of the log, he is moving at 1.2 m/s.

I understand that if you use conservation of momentum, that the log must move in the opposite direction as the logger, but that is where my friends and I cannot agree on.

Do we use the mass of the logger and log moving in the opposite direction of the logger since the logger is still on the log? Or do you just use the mass of the log moving the other direction since the logger is moving in the other direction.

Any more clarification would be great! Thank-you.

DG.

The center of mass of the system is made from the two centers of mass - the log, the runner.

If momentum is conserved, and the velocity of the runner is defined, then you know the momentum of the runner. If the center of mass remains constant then won't the center of mass of just the log need to move in the opposite direction at a speed that conserves momentum?
 
Here's something to think about: the total momentum of the system is the momentum of the log, plus the momentum of the logger. So when you use conservation of momentum, calculate the momentum of each separately, and add them up. All velocities should be taken relative to a common reference point (usually the ground).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top