Relativistic collision and invariant s

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the invariant mass squared, s = (P1+P2)², in the context of a relativistic collision involving two particles (1 and 2) transitioning to two other particles (3 and 4). Participants explore this concept in both the center of momentum frame and the lab frame, where one particle is at rest.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of the invariant s in different frames, questioning the correctness of their expressions and interpretations. They explore the implications of large invariant masses and how they relate to the energies and momenta of the particles involved. There is also an inquiry into the significance of the rest energy of one particle and its effect on the overall calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning assumptions. Some have highlighted potential typos and are seeking clarification on specific aspects of the problem. There is an ongoing exploration of how varying conditions, such as the rest state of particles and their momenta, influence the invariant mass calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are operating under the assumption that particle masses are fixed, and there is a focus on the implications of large invariant masses in the context of collider physics. The discussion also hints at the need for careful consideration of the frame of reference in relativistic collisions.

carllacan
Messages
272
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Write the invariant s = (P1+P2)2 as a function of masses amd energies of the process

1+2 → 3+4

in the center of momentum frame and on the lab frame, in which b is at rest. Interpret the result.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


For the CoM frame I have:
s = (P1+P2)2 = (E1+E2, p1 + p2)2 = (E1+E2)2
(and similar for particles 3 and 4)

In the lab frame (primed symbols are used for variables in this frame)
s' = (P'1+P'2)2 = (E'1+E'2, p'1)2 = (E'1+E'2)2 + |p1|2 = (E'1+E'2)2 + m012-E'12 = 2E'1E'2+m012+m022
(and similar for particles 3 and 4)

Is this right? I still don't feel secure with this problems .Is if is right, can we get any interesting conclusions from the result? We must have s = s', so
2E'1E'2+m012+m022 = 2E1E2+E12+E22

And I get to E'1E'2 = E1E2 + |p1|2. If the energies were being summed I would interpret it as the fact that the energies in the lab frame is the sum of the energies in the CoM frame plus the momentum of the particles, or something like that, but this means nothing to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
carllacan said:
In the lab frame (primed symbols are used for variables in this frame)
s' = (P'1+P'2)2 = (E'1+E'2, p'1)2 = (E'1+E'2)2 +[/color] |p1|2 = (E'1+E'2)2 + m012-E'12 = 2E'1E'2+m012+m022
I highlighted a typo (by the way: this forum supports LaTeX).

Before you interpret the result: you know E'2. What happens if you are interested in very large invariant ##\sqrt{s}##? 100 or 1000 times the masses, for example.
Compare this to a collider where b is not at rest.
 
mfb said:
I highlighted a typo (by the way: this forum supports LaTeX).

Before you interpret the result: you know E'2. What happens if you are interested in very large invariant ##\sqrt{s}##? 100 or 1000 times the masses, for example.
If s is very large compared to the masses then I guess the energy E'1 will depend mostly on E'2, but not on the masses or the mometums.
Compare this to a collider where b is not at rest.[/QUOTE]
If I repeat the calculus with particle 2 having momentum I get an expression where the momentums and the angle between them matter. Is that what you mean?
 
What is E'2 for a particle at rest? This is the first question, everything below relies on that answer.

Can anything depend on that? You can assume that particle masses are fixed.
carllacan said:
If I repeat the calculus with particle 2 having momentum I get an expression where the momentums and the angle between them matter. Is that what you mean?
No. For two particles of equal mass m, what do you need as E'1 to get ##\sqrt{s}=100m## if particle 2 is at rest?
What do you need if they collide head-on with equal energy?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K