Relativistic Harmonic Oscillator Lagrangian and Four Force

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Lagrangian formulation of the relativistic harmonic oscillator in an inertial laboratory frame, defined as ##L = -mc\sqrt{\dot x^{\mu} \dot x_{\mu}} - \frac{1}{2} k(\Delta x)^2 \frac{\dot x^{0}}{c}##. Key findings include the canonical momentum components ##\Pi^{0} = \frac{-E}{c}## and ##\Pi^{1} = \gamma {m\dot x}##, with ##\Pi^{0}## being conserved but not qualifying as a four-vector. The Hamiltonian derived from the Legendre transform does not equate to the expected energy, indicating a potential error in the calculations. The four-force is expressed as ##F^{\mu} = -\frac{k\Delta x}{c} \epsilon^{\mu \nu} \dot x_{\nu}##, and the oscillation frequency in the proper time frame is shown to depend on position.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with relativistic dynamics
  • Knowledge of canonical momentum and four-vectors
  • Experience with Hamiltonian mechanics and Legendre transforms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lagrangian for relativistic systems
  • Learn about the properties of four-vectors in relativistic physics
  • Explore Hamiltonian mechanics and its applications in relativistic contexts
  • Investigate the implications of position-dependent angular frequencies in oscillatory systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers working on relativistic dynamics and oscillatory systems will benefit from this discussion.

GL_Black_Hole
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider an inertial laboratory frame S with coordinates (##\lambda##; ##x##). The Lagrangian for the
relativistic harmonic oscillator in that frame is given by
##L =-mc\sqrt{\dot x^{\mu} \dot x_{\mu}} -\frac {1}{2} k(\Delta x)^2 \frac{\dot x^{0}}{c}## where ##x^0 =c\lambda##, ##x^1 =x##.
a) Find the canonical momentum ##\Pi _{\mu} = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot x^{\mu}}## in the lab frame (##t##;##x##). Are any of its components conserved? Is the canonical momentum a four vector?
b) Find the components of the four-momentum ##p^{\mu} = m \frac{d\dot x^{\mu}}{d\tau}##
c) Find the Hamiltonian in the lab frame using a Legendre transform and show that it is conserved in the lab frame. Now are either ##c \Pi^{0}## or ##c p^{0}## conserved?
d) Show that the four force ##F^{\mu}## satisifies ##F^{\mu} =-\frac{k\Delta x}{c} \epsilon^{\mu \nu} \dot x_{\nu} ##
e) Now go to the proper time frame (##\tau##, ##x##) and show that the mass oscillates with a position dependent angular frequency ##\omega (x)##
Note: the proper time frame is NOT the rest frame the mass. It only has clocks which follow along with the proper time of the particle

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


a) In the lab frame the Lagrangian is ##L= \frac{-mc^2}{\gamma} -\frac{1}{2} k(\Delta x)^2. ## I find that ##\dot x_{0} = -c## so then ##\Pi _{0} = -\frac{1}{c}({-mc^2}{\gamma} -\frac{1}{2} k(\Delta x)^2) =\frac{E}{c}## and ##\Pi_{1} = \gamma {m\dot x}## So the components of ##\Pi^{\mu}## are ##\Pi^{0} = \frac{-E}{c}## and ##\Pi^{1} =\gamma {m\dot x}##. The 0 component is conserved but because the canonical momentum is formed by taking a derivative with respect to non-invariant quantity, coordinate time, it cannot be a four vector.
b) Here I'm not sure if I'm missing something: ##p^{0} = m \frac{d\dot x^{0}}{d\tau} = mc\gamma## because ##\frac{dt}{d\tau} = \gamma## So similarly, ##p^{1} = mv\gamma## where ##v =\frac{dx}{dt}##.
c) I use the canonical momentum here and form ##H =\Pi^{
\mu}\dot x_{\mu} -L## and so ##H = -\frac{1}{c}(\gamma mc^2 + \frac{1}{2} k(\Delta x)^2)(-c) + (\gamma mv)(v) -L## but evaluating this gives me: ##(\gamma +\frac{1}{\gamma})mc^2 + \gamma mv^2 + k(\Delta x)^2 ## which does not equal E as it should.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
d) Here I'm not sure what to do and any help would be very much appreciated! e) I know that in the proper time frame ##x^{\mu} = x^{\mu} (\tau)## so ##\frac{dx^{\mu}}{d\tau} = \dot x^{\mu}## and the Lagrangian is ##L= -mc^2 - \frac{1}{2}k(\Delta x)^2 \dot x^{0}##. I find that the canonical momentum ##\Pi_{\mu} = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot x^{\mu}} = -mc\gamma \delta_{\mu}^{0}## and so ##p^{\mu} = m \frac{d\dot x^{\mu}}{d\tau} = m \frac{d(-mc\gamma \delta_{\mu}^{0})}{d\tau} = -mk\gamma \Delta x \epsilon^{\mu \nu}\dot x_{\nu}## which is not quite the same as the required result. Thanks in advance for reading this and any help is really appreciated!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K