Relativistic Lightning on Train Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving the simultaneity of lightning strikes as observed from a moving train versus an observer on the ground. The key point is that while the lightning bolts appear simultaneous to an observer on the train, they are not simultaneous for the ground observer due to the effects of special relativity, specifically the constancy of the speed of light. Participants suggest using light rays to illustrate the differing distances the light must travel to each observer. The conversation emphasizes that understanding this scenario is fundamental to grasping the principles of special relativity. Overall, the problem highlights the differences in perception of simultaneity based on relative motion.
TFM
Messages
1,016
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose the two lightning bolts shown in the figure 37.5a in the txtbook are simultaneous to an observer on the train.

Show that they are not simultaneous to an observer on the ground.

(Relevant Diagram Attached)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Thios is a long written Answer of Mastering Physics, but I am not quite sure what soirt of answer they are looking for, any ideas would be greatly appreciated,

TFM
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Hi TFM! :smile:

Assuming they don't want you to use the Lorentz transformations …

… my guess is that they want you to draw in rays of light going between Mavis and A´ or B´,

and then describe how Stanley sees those rays. :smile:
 
Assuming that the train is moving, then surely the lightning bolts will travel equal distances to Mavis in the middle as they have to travel equal distances, but to Stanley, they rays have to travel different distances. But this doesn't seem to be related to relativity?

TFM
 
TFM said:
… But this doesn't seem to be related to relativity?

Hi TFM! :smile:

It's related to the constancy of the speed of light.

The question is designed to make you see that once we assume that everyone regards the speed of light as c, then the whole of special relativity follows! :smile:
 
That makes Sense!

Thanks for the Advice, Tiny-Tim :smile:

The Ferry Man
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top